BYD ATTO 3 vs Changan CS75 Pro

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

BYD ATTO 3 in South Africa

BYD ATTO 3

Extended Range EV Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 783,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 310 Nm
VS
Changan CS75 Pro in South Africa

Changan CS75 Pro

1.5T AT 5S CE Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 474,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 300 Nm ⛽ 13.33 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BYD ATTO 3 vs Changan CS75 Pro: the short answer

ATTO 3 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CS75 Pro remains close.

CS75 Pro starts ZAR 270,000 cheaper ATTO 3 from ZAR 699,900 · CS75 Pro from ZAR 429,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification ATTO 3 CS75 Pro
Maximum Power ATTO 3150 kW CS75 Pro138 kW
Maximum Torque ATTO 3310 Nm CS75 Pro300 Nm
Engine Size ATTO 3Not Applicable CS75 Pro1494 cc
Combined Fuel Economy ATTO 3Not Applicable CS75 Pro13.33 km/l
Ground Clearance ATTO 3175 mm CS75 ProNot Officially Disclosed

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

ATTO 3

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

CS75 Pro

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

ATTO 3

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

CS75 Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec ATTO 3 CS75 Pro
Model Introduced Year 2023 2025
Generation First South African ATTO 3 generation Current South African CS75 Pro generation with two equipment grades and two seating configurations.
Facelift History No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026 No South African facelift has been announced since the present CS75 Pro range entered local sale.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Compact SUV Mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Passenger car
Spec ATTO 3 CS75 Pro
Length 4455 mm 4730 mm
Width 1875 mm 1870 mm
Height 1615 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase 2720 mm 2786 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 310 l 620 l
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 1550 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2160 kg 1925 kg
Payload Capacity 410 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 750 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.25 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 1010 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 920 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1070 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 760 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This ATTO 3 and CS75 Pro comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: ATTO 3 65 vs CS75 Pro 59.

Efficiency index: ATTO 3 90 vs CS75 Pro 52.

Safety-equipment index: ATTO 3 99 vs CS75 Pro 76.

Practicality index: ATTO 3 51 vs CS75 Pro 79.

Ownership-cover index: ATTO 3 not separately scored vs CS75 Pro not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

ATTO 3 leads by 8 points

ATTO 3 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CS75 Pro remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 69% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

ATTO 3

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Practicality 51
Performance 65
Efficiency 90
Safety 99
Practicality 51
Leads by 8 points
67
#2

CS75 Pro

65% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 79 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 59
Efficiency 52
Safety 76
Practicality 79
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance ATTO 3 +6 Efficiency ATTO 3 +38 Safety ATTO 3 +23 Practicality CS75 Pro +28

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

ATTO 3

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 51/100

CS75 Pro

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 79/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BYD ATTO 3 leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 67 pts for CS75 Pro

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, ATTO 3 leads. However, CS75 Pro may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

ATTO 3
ATTO 3
VS
Tucson
Tucson
ATTO 3 vs Tucson →
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
VS
T2
T2
ATTO 3 vs T2 →
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
VS
CX-5
CX-5
ATTO 3 vs CX-5 →
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
VS
Harrier
Harrier
ATTO 3 vs Harrier →
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
VS
H6
H6
ATTO 3 vs H6 →
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
VS
C7
C7
ATTO 3 vs C7 →
CS75 Pro
CS75 Pro
VS
Tucson
Tucson
CS75 Pro vs Tucson →
CS75 Pro
CS75 Pro
VS
T2
T2
CS75 Pro vs T2 →

ATTO 3 vs CS75 Pro questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.