BYD ATTO 2 DM-i vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

BYD ATTO 2 DM-i in South Africa

BYD ATTO 2 DM-i

Dynamic DM-i Plug-in Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 489,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 72 kW 🔧 122 Nm ⛽ 19.6 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Comfort HEV Hybrid Current
ZAR 439,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 310 Nm ⛽ 18.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

⚡ Performance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
⛽ Fuel Economy ATTO 2 DM-i
🛡 Safety ATTO 2 DM-i
📦 Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV starts ZAR 10,000 cheaper ATTO 2 DM-i from ZAR 449,900 · Tiggo 4 Cross HEV from ZAR 439,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec ATTO 2 DM-i Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Maximum Power 72 kW @ 6000 rpm 150 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque 122 Nm @ 4500 rpm 310 Nm
Engine Size 1498 cc 1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 19.6 km/l 18.5 km/l
Ground Clearance 160 mm 180 mm
Boot / Load Bay 425 l -
Airbags 6 Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 1510 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 years/150000 km complete vehicle; 8 years/200000 km power battery; 5 years/150000 km drive unit 5 Years / 150 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while ATTO 2 DM-i remains close.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +25 pts
Efficiency ATTO 2 DM-i +6 pts
Safety ATTO 2 DM-i +1 pts
Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +11 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

ATTO 2 DM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Catalogue-index leader

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

ATTO 2 DM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec ATTO 2 DM-i Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation First South African ATTO 2 DM-i generation Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross HEV range
Facelift History No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026 Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Compact SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - Not Available
Spec ATTO 2 DM-i Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Length 4330 mm 4351 mm
Width 1830 mm 1831 mm
Height 1675 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2620 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l -
Boot/Cargo Space 425 l -
Kerb Weight 1510 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2000 kg 1905 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg -
Towing Capacity 750 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.25 m -
Front Headroom 1020 mm -
Rear Headroom 960 mm -
Front Legroom 1100 mm -
Rear Legroom 760 mm -

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV leads by 8 points

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while ATTO 2 DM-i remains close.

Index leader 73 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 52% source coverage
73
#1 Index leader

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

52% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 62
Performance 62
Efficiency 75
Safety 91
Practicality 67
Leads by 8 points
65
#2

ATTO 2 DM-i

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 37
Performance 37
Efficiency 81
Safety 92
Practicality 56
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +25 Efficiency ATTO 2 DM-i +6 Safety ATTO 2 DM-i +1 Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Performance 62/100
Efficiency 75/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 67/100

ATTO 2 DM-i

Performance 37/100
Efficiency 81/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 56/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV leads the catalogue index with 73 pts vs 65 pts for ATTO 2 DM-i

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Tiggo 4 Cross HEV leads. However, ATTO 2 DM-i may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Other Comparisons Worth Checking

See how similar cars go head-to-head — you might find a better fit than you expected.

ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Jimny
Jimny
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Jimny →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
CX-3
CX-3
ATTO 2 DM-i vs CX-3 →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Jimny 5-Door →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Dashing
Dashing
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Dashing →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Outlander Sport →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
ATTO 2 DM-i vs X70 Plus →
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
VS
Jimny
Jimny
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV vs Jimny →
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
VS
CX-3
CX-3
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV vs CX-3 →

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
ATTO 2 DM-i vs ATTO 3 →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
ATTO 2 DM-i vs ATTO 8 →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
SEALION 5 DM-i
SEALION 5 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i vs SEALION 5 DM-i →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
ATTO 2 DM-i vs SEALION 7 →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Chery Q
Chery QUpcoming
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Chery Q →

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This ATTO 2 DM-i and Tiggo 4 Cross HEV comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: ATTO 2 DM-i 37 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 62.

Efficiency index: ATTO 2 DM-i 81 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 75.

Safety-equipment index: ATTO 2 DM-i 92 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 91.

Practicality index: ATTO 2 DM-i 56 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 67.

Ownership-cover index: ATTO 2 DM-i not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.