BYD ATTO 2 DM-i vs Mazda CX-60

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

BYD ATTO 2 DM-i in South Africa

BYD ATTO 2 DM-i

Dynamic DM-i Plug-in Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 489,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 72 kW 🔧 122 Nm ⛽ 19.6 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

⚡ Performance CX-60
⛽ Fuel Economy ATTO 2 DM-i
🛡 Safety CX-60
📦 Practicality CX-60
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
ATTO 2 DM-i starts ZAR 340,300 cheaper ATTO 2 DM-i from ZAR 449,900 · CX-60 from ZAR 790,200

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec ATTO 2 DM-i CX-60
Maximum Power 72 kW @ 6000 rpm 141 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 122 Nm @ 4500 rpm 261 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Engine Size 1498 cc 2488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 19.6 km/l 13.0 km/l
Ground Clearance 160 mm 178.8 mm
Boot / Load Bay 425 l 477 l
Airbags 6 7
Kerb Weight 1510 kg 1470 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 years/150000 km complete vehicle; 8 years/200000 km power battery; 5 years/150000 km drive unit 5 Years/Unlimited km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

ATTO 2 DM-i and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance CX-60 +22 pts
Efficiency ATTO 2 DM-i +30 pts
Safety CX-60 +6 pts
Practicality CX-60 +12 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

ATTO 2 DM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Catalogue-index leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

ATTO 2 DM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec ATTO 2 DM-i CX-60
Model Introduced Year 2026 2023
Generation First South African ATTO 2 DM-i generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture
Facelift History No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026 Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active Active
Segment Compact SUV Premium mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1470 kg
Spec ATTO 2 DM-i CX-60
Length 4330 mm 4745 mm
Width 1830 mm 1890 mm
Height 1675 mm 1687.5 mm
Wheelbase 2620 mm 2870 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 178.8 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 58 l
Boot/Cargo Space 425 l 477 l
Kerb Weight 1510 kg 1470 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2000 kg 2342 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 872 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.25 m 5.85 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm -
Rear Headroom 960 mm -
Front Legroom 1100 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 760 mm 990 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

CX-60 leads by 5 points

ATTO 2 DM-i and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 70 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Index leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 5 points
65
#2

ATTO 2 DM-i

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 37
Performance 37
Efficiency 81
Safety 92
Practicality 56
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +22 Efficiency ATTO 2 DM-i +30 Safety CX-60 +6 Practicality CX-60 +12

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

ATTO 2 DM-i

Performance 37/100
Efficiency 81/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 56/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Mazda CX-60 leads the catalogue index with 70 pts vs 65 pts for ATTO 2 DM-i

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, CX-60 leads. However, ATTO 2 DM-i may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Other Comparisons Worth Checking

See how similar cars go head-to-head — you might find a better fit than you expected.

ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Territory
Territory
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Territory →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
ATTO 2 DM-i vs T-Roc →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
H7
H7
ATTO 2 DM-i vs H7 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
CX-60 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
CX-60 vs SEALION 6 DM-i →

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
ATTO 2 DM-i vs ATTO 3 →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
ATTO 2 DM-i vs ATTO 8 →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
SEALION 5 DM-i
SEALION 5 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i vs SEALION 5 DM-i →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
ATTO 2 DM-i vs SEALION 7 →
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
VS
Chery Q
Chery QUpcoming
ATTO 2 DM-i vs Chery Q →

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This ATTO 2 DM-i and CX-60 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: ATTO 2 DM-i 37 vs CX-60 59.

Efficiency index: ATTO 2 DM-i 81 vs CX-60 51.

Safety-equipment index: ATTO 2 DM-i 92 vs CX-60 98.

Practicality index: ATTO 2 DM-i 56 vs CX-60 68.

Ownership-cover index: ATTO 2 DM-i not separately scored vs CX-60 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.