Hyundai ALCAZAR vs Suzuki Eeco

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai ALCAZAR in South Africa

Hyundai ALCAZAR

1.5D Elite AT Diesel Current
ZAR 669,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 16.9 km/l
VS
Suzuki Eeco in South Africa

Suzuki Eeco

1.2 Passenger Van MT Petrol 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 219,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW 🔧 103 Nm ⛽ 16.9 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai ALCAZAR vs Suzuki Eeco: the short answer

ALCAZAR holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eeco.

Eeco starts ZAR 303,000 cheaper ALCAZAR from ZAR 499,900 · Eeco from ZAR 196,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification ALCAZAR Eeco
Maximum Power ALCAZAR85 kW Eeco61 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque ALCAZAR250 Nm Eeco103 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Engine Size ALCAZAR1493 cc Eeco1197 cc
Combined Fuel Economy ALCAZAR16.9 km/l Eeco16.9 km/l
Ground Clearance ALCAZAR200 mm Eeco170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

ALCAZAR

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Eeco

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

ALCAZAR

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Eeco

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec ALCAZAR Eeco
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2017
Generation Current South African ALCAZAR listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Second-generation Eeco on dedicated commercial platform with purpose-built high-roof body; G12B engine consistent across the Eeco's SA lifespan; commercial application specific, not shared with passenger vehicle range
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Second-generation Eeco in SA since 2017; minor exterior and interior updates in 2021; specification has remained stable — the buyer segment does not require frequent feature updates
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Seven-seat SUV Van
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. Solid White, Metallic Silver
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Van
Tare Mass Kg 1445 kg 905 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Van
Spec ALCAZAR Eeco
Length 4560 mm 3675 mm
Width 1800 mm 1475 mm
Height 1710 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase 2760 mm 2350 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 35 l
Boot/Cargo Space 180 l 120 l
Kerb Weight 1445 kg 905 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2090 kg 1280 kg
Payload Capacity 645 kg 390 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 7 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 4.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1020 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1000 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 930 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 750 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This ALCAZAR and Eeco comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: ALCAZAR 44 vs Eeco 24.

Efficiency index: ALCAZAR 68 vs Eeco 65.

Safety-equipment index: ALCAZAR 89 vs Eeco 36.

Practicality index: ALCAZAR 64 vs Eeco 54.

Ownership-cover index: ALCAZAR 65 vs Eeco 60.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

ALCAZAR leads by 20 points

ALCAZAR holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eeco.

Evidence leader 66 /100
Lead 20 points
Data 70% source coverage
66
#1 Evidence leader

ALCAZAR

70% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Performance 44
Performance 44
Efficiency 68
Safety 89
Practicality 64
Ownership 65
Leads by 20 points
46
#2

Eeco

85% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 65 Check Performance 24
Performance 24
Efficiency 65
Safety 36
Practicality 54
Ownership 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance ALCAZAR +20 Efficiency ALCAZAR +3 Safety ALCAZAR +53 Practicality ALCAZAR +10 Ownership ALCAZAR +5

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

ALCAZAR

Performance 44/100
Efficiency 68/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 64/100
Ownership 65/100

Eeco

Performance 24/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 36/100
Practicality 54/100
Ownership 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai ALCAZAR leads the specification evidence index with 66 pts vs 46 pts for Eeco

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, ALCAZAR leads. However, Eeco may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

ALCAZAR vs Eeco questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.