Suzuki Across vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Suzuki Across in South Africa

Suzuki Across

2.5 PHEV E-CVT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 1,199,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 225 kW 🔧 227 Nm ⛽ 100 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

LiT MT 1.5L Petrol Manual
ZAR 269,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Across
Fuel Economy Across
🛡 Safety Across
📦 Practicality Across
🔑 Ownership Across
Tiggo 4 Pro starts ZAR 1199900 cheaper Across from ZAR 1,199,900 · Tiggo 4 Pro from ZAR 269,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Across Tiggo 4 Pro
Engine Power 225 kW 83 kW
Torque 227 Nm 138 Nm
Engine Size 2487 cc 1.5 cc
Claimed Mileage 100 km/l 14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance 200 mm 180 mm
Boot / Load Bay 490 l -
Airbags 8 Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 1955 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 Years / 200000 km 5 Year / 150 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Across dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Across +42 pts
Efficiency Across +41 pts
Safety Across +25 pts
Practicality Across +8 pts
Ownership Across +35 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Across

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Tiggo 4 Pro

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Across

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Tiggo 4 Pro

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Across Tiggo 4 Pro
Model Introduced Year 2021 2024
Generation Fifth-generation RAV4 platform (TNGA-K). The Across uses the same body, drivetrain and electronics as the RAV4 PHEV, distinguished only by Suzuki badging and a slightly different grille treatment. Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Pro range
Facelift History Originally launched globally in 2020 as Toyota RAV4 PHEV; rebadged as Suzuki Across for European and select markets including SA from 2021. No major facelift to date. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2021 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note Pure White, Silver Metallic, Attitude Black, Emotional Red, Cyan Metallic, Dark Blue Mica -
Dealer Stock Note Phev grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Across Tiggo 4 Pro
Ground Clearance 200 mm 180 mm
Wheelbase 2690 mm 2610 mm
Length 4635 mm 4318 mm
Width 1855 mm 1831 mm
Height 1690 mm 1662 mm
Kerb Weight 1955 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight 2510 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 490 l -
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1300 kg
Front Track Width 1605 mm -
Rear Track Width 1620 mm -
Turning Radius 5.7 m -
Load Bed Length 490 l -
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom 1090 mm -
Rear Legroom 950 mm -
Front Headroom 1015 mm -
Rear Headroom 1004 mm -
Front Shoulder Room 1455 mm -
Rear Shoulder Room 1418 mm -
Boot Space Seats Folded 1604 l -
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload 555 kg -
Boot Volume 490 l -
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Front Overhang 915 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l -
Rear Overhang 1030 mm -
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2510 kg -
Ground Clearance Max 200 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance Min 200 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 200 mm 180 mm
Height Mm 1690 mm 1662 mm
Length Mm 4635 mm 4318 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 490 l -
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg 555 kg -
Cargo Volume 490 l -
Tare Mass Kg 1955 kg -
Turning Circle 5.7 m -
Turning Circle M 5.7 m -
Width Mm 1855 mm 1831 mm
Boot Space Seats Folded 1604 l -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Across leads by 29 points

Across dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Winner 84 /100
Lead 29 points
Data 100% confidence
84
#1 Winner

Across

100% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Practicality 66
Performance 78
Efficiency 98
Safety 100
Practicality 66
Ownership 82
Leads by 29 points
55
#2

Tiggo 4 Pro

70% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 75 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 57
Safety 75
Practicality 58
Ownership 47
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Across +42 Efficiency Across +41 Safety Across +25 Practicality Across +8 Ownership Across +35

High confidence result.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Across

Performance 78/100
Efficiency 98/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 82/100

Tiggo 4 Pro

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 75/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 47/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Suzuki Across wins with 84 pts vs 55 pts for Tiggo 4 Pro

In structured scoring, Across emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Tiggo 4 Pro may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Across edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Across 98 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 57. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Across 100, Tiggo 4 Pro 75. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Across 82, Tiggo 4 Pro 47. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Across 66, Tiggo 4 Pro 58. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Across 78, Tiggo 4 Pro 36. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Across edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Across scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Across and Tiggo 4 Pro in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Across scores 78 vs 36.

Efficiency: Across scores 98 vs 57.

Safety: Across scores 100 vs 75.

Practicality: Across scores 66 vs 58.

Ownership: Across scores 82 vs 47.

Final structured scoring gives Across the advantage in this comparison.