Suzuki Across vs Changan Alsvin

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Across in South Africa

Suzuki Across

1.5 GLX 6AT Hybrid 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 464,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
Changan Alsvin in South Africa

Changan Alsvin

1.5 AT CE Petrol 5-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 78 kW 🔧 145 Nm ⛽ 14.49 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Across vs Changan Alsvin: the short answer

Across holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Alsvin.

Alsvin starts ZAR 100,000 cheaper Across from ZAR 349,900 · Alsvin from ZAR 249,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Across Alsvin
Maximum Power Across77 kW Alsvin78 kW
Maximum Torque Across138 Nm Alsvin145 Nm
Engine Size Across1462 cc Alsvin1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Across16.1 km/l Alsvin14.49 km/l
Ground Clearance Across0 mm Alsvin150 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Suzuki Across

1.5 GLX 6AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Changan Alsvin

1.5 AT CE

Hagalu editorial rating
3.9/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Across

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Alsvin

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Across

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Alsvin

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Across Alsvin
Model Introduced Year 2026 2025
Generation Current market generation Current South African Alsvin generation launched with two locally named derivatives in 2025.
Facelift History Current market specification No South African facelift has been announced since the current range entered local retail sale.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style SUV Sedan
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Compact sedan
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger car
Spec Across Alsvin
Length 4635 mm 4390 mm
Width 1855 mm 1725 mm
Height 1690 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase 2690 mm 2535 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 150 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 490 l 390 l
Kerb Weight 1940 kg 1069 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2510 kg 1470 kg
Payload Capacity 570 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 705 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 950 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1050 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 900 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Across and Alsvin comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Across 34 vs Alsvin 35.

Efficiency index: Across 67 vs Alsvin 56.

Safety-equipment index: Across 87 vs Alsvin 32.

Practicality index: Across 58 vs Alsvin 54.

Ownership-cover index: Across not separately scored vs Alsvin not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Across leads by 18 points

Across holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Alsvin.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 18 points
Data 74% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

Across

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 67
Safety 87
Practicality 58
Leads by 18 points
43
#2

Alsvin

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 56 Check Safety 32
Performance 35
Efficiency 56
Safety 32
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Alsvin +1 Efficiency Across +11 Safety Across +55 Practicality Across +4

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Across

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 58/100

Alsvin

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Suzuki Across leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 43 pts for Alsvin

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Across leads. However, Alsvin may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Across vs Alsvin questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.