BMW 4 Series Convertible vs Chery Tiggo 7

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

BMW 4 Series Convertible in South Africa

BMW 4 Series Convertible

M440i xDrive Convertible Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,642,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 7 in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 7

Prime 1.5T DCT Petrol 6-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 429,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 108 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BMW 4 Series Convertible vs Chery Tiggo 7: the short answer

4 Series Convertible has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 7 remains close.

Tiggo 7 starts ZAR 716,600 cheaper 4 Series Convertible from ZAR 1,146,500 · Tiggo 7 from ZAR 429,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 4 Series Convertible Tiggo 7
Maximum Power 4 Series Convertible285 kW Tiggo 7108 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque 4 Series Convertible500 Nm @ 1800-5000 rpm Tiggo 7210 Nm
Engine Size 4 Series Convertible2998 cc Tiggo 71500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 4 Series Convertible12.5 km/l Tiggo 714.5 km/l
Ground Clearance 4 Series Convertible140 mm Tiggo 7154 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

BMW 4 Series Convertible

M440i xDrive Convertible

Hagalu editorial rating
3.7/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Chery Tiggo 7

Prime 1.5T DCT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

4 Series Convertible

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Tiggo 7

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

4 Series Convertible

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Tiggo 7

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 4 Series Convertible Tiggo 7
Model Introduced Year 2020 2026
Generation G23 four-seat premium convertible related to the G22 Coupé but with body- and roof-specific packaging. Current South Africa Tiggo 7 range
Facelift History Current updated G23-generation BMW 4 Series Convertible offered in South Africa with a fabric soft top. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Convertible SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Premium Convertible SUV
Vehicle Type Car SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1437 kg
Spec 4 Series Convertible Tiggo 7
Length 4770 mm 4553 mm
Width 1852 mm 1862 mm
Height 1394 mm 1686 mm
Wheelbase 2851 mm 2670 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 140 mm 154 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 154 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 385 l 565 l
Kerb Weight 1965 kg 1437 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2375 kg 1888 kg
Payload Capacity 485 kg 451 kg
Towing Capacity 1800 kg 675 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 997 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 942 mm 970 mm
Front Legroom 1049 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 899 mm 950 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This 4 Series Convertible and Tiggo 7 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 4 Series Convertible 97 vs Tiggo 7 46.

Efficiency index: 4 Series Convertible 49 vs Tiggo 7 58.

Safety-equipment index: 4 Series Convertible 92 vs Tiggo 7 91.

Practicality index: 4 Series Convertible 55 vs Tiggo 7 60.

Ownership-cover index: 4 Series Convertible not separately scored vs Tiggo 7 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

4 Series Convertible leads by 11 points

4 Series Convertible has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 7 remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 83% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

4 Series Convertible

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 97 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 97
Efficiency 49
Safety 92
Practicality 55
Leads by 11 points
64
#2

Tiggo 7

63% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 46
Performance 46
Efficiency 58
Safety 91
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 4 Series Convertible +51 Efficiency Tiggo 7 +9 Safety 4 Series Convertible +1 Practicality Tiggo 7 +5

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

4 Series Convertible

Performance 97/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 55/100

Tiggo 7

Performance 46/100
Efficiency 58/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW 4 Series Convertible leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 64 pts for Tiggo 7

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 4 Series Convertible leads. However, Tiggo 7 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

4 Series Convertible vs Tiggo 7 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.