Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab vs Hyundai Tucson

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 959,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 470 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
VS
Hyundai Tucson in South Africa

Hyundai Tucson

2.0D AT Executive AWD Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 764,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 137 kW 🔧 416 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab vs Hyundai Tucson: the short answer

Triton Double Cab and Tucson are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Tucson starts ZAR 71,090 cheaper Triton Double Cab from ZAR 639,990 · Tucson from ZAR 568,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Triton Double Cab Tucson
Maximum Power Triton Double Cab150 kW @ 3500 rpm Tucson137 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque Triton Double Cab470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm Tucson416 Nm @ 2000 rpm
Engine Size Triton Double Cab2442 cc Tucson1995 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Triton Double Cab11.9 km/l Tucson13.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Triton Double Cab228 mm Tucson181 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Hyundai Tucson

2.0D AT Executive AWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Tucson

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Triton Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tucson

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Triton Double Cab Tucson
Model Introduced Year 2024 2004
Generation Sixth-generation Triton Fourth generation Tucson on Hyundai's i-GMP platform; distinctive parametric design language makes it one of the more striking mid-size SUVs in SA
Facelift History Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024; Bi-Turbo added in 2026. Fourth generation launched in SA in 2021; major step change in styling, interior quality, and technology over the third-gen car
Facelift Launched Since Current specification 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double-cab pickup SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment One-ton double-cab pickup SUV
Vehicle Type Light commercial vehicle SUV
Color Note - White, Black, Silver, Blue, Grey, Green
Dealer Stock Note - Executive grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.0D AT Executive AWD
Tare Mass Kg - 1720 kg
Spec Triton Double Cab Tucson
Length 5360 mm 4630 mm
Width 1930 mm 1865 mm
Height 1815 mm 1665 mm
Wheelbase 3130 mm 2755 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 228 mm 181 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 195 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 l 54 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1262 l 540 l
Kerb Weight 2035 kg 1720 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3020 kg 2110 kg
Payload Capacity 985 kg 390 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.35 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 972 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1059 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 857 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Triton Double Cab and Tucson comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Triton Double Cab 75 vs Tucson 69.

Efficiency index: Triton Double Cab 47 vs Tucson 56.

Safety-equipment index: Triton Double Cab 95 vs Tucson 92.

Practicality index: Triton Double Cab 90 vs Tucson 68.

Ownership-cover index: Triton Double Cab not separately scored vs Tucson 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Triton Double Cab leads by 7 points

Triton Double Cab and Tucson are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 83% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 95
Practicality 90
Leads by 7 points
71
#2

Tucson

93% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 56
Performance 69
Efficiency 56
Safety 92
Practicality 68
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Triton Double Cab +6 Efficiency Tucson +9 Safety Triton Double Cab +3 Practicality Triton Double Cab +22

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Triton Double Cab

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 90/100

Tucson

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 68/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 71 pts for Tucson

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Triton Double Cab leads. However, Tucson may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
Triton Double Cab vs E5 EM-i →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Triton Double Cab vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
06
06
Triton Double Cab vs 06 →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Ranger XL
Ranger XL
Triton Double Cab vs Ranger XL →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Triton Double Cab vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Amarok
Amarok
Triton Double Cab vs Amarok →
Tucson
Tucson
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
Tucson vs E5 EM-i →
Tucson
Tucson
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tucson vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →

Triton Double Cab vs Tucson questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.