Chery Tiggo 4 Pro vs Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

LiT MT 1.5L Petrol Current
ZAR 269,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV

PHEV Vanguard AWD Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 989,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 455 kW 🔧 920 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro vs Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV: the short answer

Tiggo 9 PHEV has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Tiggo 4 Pro.

Tiggo 4 Pro starts ZAR 570,000 cheaper Tiggo 4 Pro from ZAR 269,900 · Tiggo 9 PHEV from ZAR 839,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Tiggo 4 Pro Tiggo 9 PHEV
Maximum Power Tiggo 4 Pro83 kW @ 5500 rpm Tiggo 9 PHEV455 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Tiggo 4 Pro138 Nm Tiggo 9 PHEV920 Nm
Engine Size Tiggo 4 Pro1500 cc Tiggo 9 PHEV1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Tiggo 4 Pro14.3 km/l Tiggo 9 PHEV16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance Tiggo 4 Pro170 mm Tiggo 9 PHEV183 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Tiggo 4 Pro

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Tiggo 4 Pro

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Tiggo 9 PHEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Tiggo 4 Pro Tiggo 9 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2024 2026
Generation Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Pro range Current South Africa Tiggo 9 PHEV range
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2024 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1309 kg 2265 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Tiggo 4 Pro Tiggo 9 PHEV
Length 4318 mm 4810 mm
Width 1831 mm 1925 mm
Height 1662 mm 1741 mm
Wheelbase 2610 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 183 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 340 l 448 l
Kerb Weight 1309 kg 2265 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1684 kg 2886 kg
Payload Capacity 375 kg 621 kg
Towing Capacity 1300 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.9 m
Front Headroom 1010 mm 1025 mm
Rear Headroom 975 mm 990 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 930 mm 960 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Tiggo 4 Pro and Tiggo 9 PHEV comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Tiggo 4 Pro 36 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 98.

Efficiency index: Tiggo 4 Pro 57 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 72.

Safety-equipment index: Tiggo 4 Pro 91 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 94.

Practicality index: Tiggo 4 Pro 54 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 70.

Ownership-cover index: Tiggo 4 Pro not separately scored vs Tiggo 9 PHEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 9 PHEV leads by 26 points

Tiggo 9 PHEV has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Tiggo 4 Pro.

Evidence leader 85 /100
Lead 26 points
Data 69% source coverage
85
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

69% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Practicality 70
Performance 98
Efficiency 72
Safety 94
Practicality 70
Leads by 26 points
59
#2

Tiggo 4 Pro

63% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 57
Safety 91
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 9 PHEV +62 Efficiency Tiggo 9 PHEV +15 Safety Tiggo 9 PHEV +3 Practicality Tiggo 9 PHEV +16

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 72/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 70/100

Tiggo 4 Pro

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV leads the specification evidence index with 85 pts vs 59 pts for Tiggo 4 Pro

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 9 PHEV leads. However, Tiggo 4 Pro may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Tiggo 4 Pro vs Tiggo 9 PHEV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.