Mazda CX-5 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

LiT MT 1.5L Petrol Current
ZAR 269,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro: the short answer

CX-5 and Tiggo 4 Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Tiggo 4 Pro starts ZAR 300,600 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · Tiggo 4 Pro from ZAR 269,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 Tiggo 4 Pro
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm Tiggo 4 Pro83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm Tiggo 4 Pro138 Nm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc Tiggo 4 Pro1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l Tiggo 4 Pro14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm Tiggo 4 Pro170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Tiggo 4 Pro

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 4 Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 Tiggo 4 Pro
Model Introduced Year 2017 2024
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Pro range
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Mid-size family SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg 1309 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-5 Tiggo 4 Pro
Length 4575 mm 4318 mm
Width 1845 mm 1831 mm
Height 1680 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 340 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1309 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 1684 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 1300 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m 5.5 m
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 1007 mm 930 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 170 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1010 mm
Rear Headroom - 975 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and Tiggo 4 Pro comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 36.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 57.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 91.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 54.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Pro not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-5 leads by 4 points

CX-5 and Tiggo 4 Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 63 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 78% source coverage
63
#1 Evidence leader

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Leads by 4 points
59
#2

Tiggo 4 Pro

63% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 57
Safety 91
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-5 +12 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Pro +1 Safety Tiggo 4 Pro +3 Practicality CX-5 +7

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

Tiggo 4 Pro

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-5 leads the specification evidence index with 63 pts vs 59 pts for Tiggo 4 Pro

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-5 leads. However, Tiggo 4 Pro may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
CX-5 vs Corolla Cross →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
CX-5 vs Tiggo 7 →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
CS75 Pro
CS75 Pro
CX-5 vs CS75 Pro →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jolion
Jolion
CX-5 vs Jolion →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jolion Pro Limited
Jolion Pro Limited
CX-5 vs Jolion Pro Limited →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
CX-5 vs Jimny 5-Door →
Tiggo 4 Pro
Tiggo 4 Pro
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
Tiggo 4 Pro vs Corolla Cross →
Tiggo 4 Pro
Tiggo 4 Pro
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 4 Pro vs Tiggo 7 →

CX-5 vs Tiggo 4 Pro questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.