Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Comfort HEV Hybrid Current
ZAR 439,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 310 Nm ⛽ 18.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

LiT MT 1.5L Petrol Current
ZAR 269,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro: the short answer

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 4 Pro remains close.

Tiggo 4 Pro starts ZAR 170,000 cheaper Tiggo 4 Cross HEV from ZAR 439,900 · Tiggo 4 Pro from ZAR 269,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Tiggo 4 Cross HEV Tiggo 4 Pro
Maximum Power Tiggo 4 Cross HEV150 kW @ 5500 rpm Tiggo 4 Pro83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Tiggo 4 Cross HEV310 Nm Tiggo 4 Pro138 Nm
Engine Size Tiggo 4 Cross HEV1500 cc Tiggo 4 Pro1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Tiggo 4 Cross HEV18.5 km/l Tiggo 4 Pro14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV180 mm Tiggo 4 Pro170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Tiggo 4 Pro

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 4 Pro

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Tiggo 4 Cross HEV Tiggo 4 Pro
Model Introduced Year 2026 2024
Generation Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross HEV range Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Pro range
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1387 kg 1309 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Tiggo 4 Cross HEV Tiggo 4 Pro
Length 4351 mm 4318 mm
Width 1831 mm 1831 mm
Height 1662 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2610 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 180 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 340 l 340 l
Kerb Weight 1387 kg 1309 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1905 kg 1684 kg
Payload Capacity 518 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 1300 kg 1300 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1010 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 975 mm 975 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 930 mm 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Tiggo 4 Cross HEV and Tiggo 4 Pro comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 62 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 36.

Efficiency index: Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 75 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 57.

Safety-equipment index: Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 91 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 91.

Practicality index: Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 57 vs Tiggo 4 Pro 54.

Ownership-cover index: Tiggo 4 Cross HEV not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Pro not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV leads by 12 points

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 4 Pro remains close.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 12 points
Data 65% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

65% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Practicality 57
Performance 62
Efficiency 75
Safety 91
Practicality 57
Leads by 12 points
59
#2

Tiggo 4 Pro

63% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 57
Safety 91
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +26 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +18 Safety Level Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +3

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Performance 62/100
Efficiency 75/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 57/100

Tiggo 4 Pro

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 59 pts for Tiggo 4 Pro

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 4 Cross HEV leads. However, Tiggo 4 Pro may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV vs Tiggo 4 Pro questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.