GWM Tank 300 vs Mahindra XUV500

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Mahindra XUV500
GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 2.8 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV500 in South Africa

Mahindra XUV500

Archive reference
No longer sold new historical model
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tank 300
Fuel Economy XUV500
🛡 Safety Tank 300
📦 Practicality Tank 300
🔑 Ownership Tank 300

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Tank 300 XUV500
Engine Power 240 Not confirmed
Torque 750 Not confirmed
Engine Size 1999 Not confirmed
Claimed Mileage 2.8 Not confirmed
Ground Clearance 224 Not confirmed
Boot Space 490 Not confirmed
Airbags 8 Not confirmed
Kerb Weight 2050 Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 Not confirmed
Warranty 5 Not confirmed

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Tank 300 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tank 300 +32 pts
Efficiency XUV500 +17 pts
Safety Tank 300 +100 pts
Practicality Tank 300 +26 pts
Ownership Tank 300 +15 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

XUV500

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Tank 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

XUV500

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Tank 300 XUV500
0–100 km/h 167 sec Not confirmed
0-100 km/h 167 sec Not confirmed
Acceleration 0 100 167 sec Not confirmed
Active Exhaust Not Available Not confirmed
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Not confirmed
Battery Capacity 19.1 kWh Not confirmed
Cylinder Bore 82.5 mm Not confirmed
Combined System Power 255 Not confirmed
Combined System Torque 615 Not confirmed
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 Not confirmed
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Not confirmed
Cylinders 4 Not confirmed
Displacement 1999 cc Not confirmed
Engine 2.0L GW4C20D Turbocharged Petrol + Rear Electric Motor Not confirmed
Engine Code GW4C20D Not confirmed
Engine Config 2.0L GW4C20D Turbocharged Petrol + Rear Electric Motor Not confirmed
Engine Cylinders 4 Not confirmed
Engine Displacement 1999 cc Not confirmed
Engine Displacement Cc 1999 cc Not confirmed
Engine Displacement Litres 2 l Not confirmed
Engine Position Front Transverse Not confirmed
Engine Power kW 240 kW Not confirmed
Engine Torque Nm 750 Nm Not confirmed
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Petrol Not confirmed
Engine Type Config Inline 4 Cylinder (I4) DOHC 16-Valve Turbocharged Not confirmed
Engine Valves 16 Not confirmed
EV Range 105 km Not confirmed
Fuel Grade Required Petrol Not confirmed
Fuel System Direct Injection Not confirmed
Induction Turbocharged Not confirmed
Max Power kW 240 kW Not confirmed
Maximum Engine RPM 6,000 rpm Not confirmed
Max Torque Nm 750 Nm Not confirmed
Maximum Power 240 kW Not confirmed
Maximum Torque 750 Nm Not confirmed
Engine Oil Capacity 5.5 l Not confirmed
Power 240 kW Not confirmed
Power Assisted Steering Electric Power Assisted Not confirmed
Power 322 bhp Not confirmed
Power kW Rpm 5,500 rpm Not confirmed
Power @ RPM 5,500 rpm Not confirmed
Piston Stroke 93.1 mm Not confirmed
Top Speed 195 km/h Not confirmed
Torque 750 Nm Not confirmed
Torque Nm Rpm 1,500-4,000 rpm Not confirmed
Torque @ RPM 1,500-4,000 rpm Not confirmed
Turbo Type Turbocharged Not confirmed
Turbocharger Yes Not confirmed
Valves per Cylinder 16 Not confirmed
Variable Valve Timing Yes Not confirmed
Spec Tank 300 XUV500
360 Degree Camera Yes Not confirmed
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Not confirmed
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Not confirmed
Around View Monitor Yes Not confirmed
Attention Assist Yes Not confirmed
Autonomous Emergency Braking Yes Not confirmed
Automatic High Beam Yes Not confirmed
Auto Highbeam Yes Not confirmed
Auto Lights Yes Not confirmed
Auto Park Assist No Not confirmed
Auto Wipers Yes Not confirmed
Blind Spot Monitoring Yes Not confirmed
Blind Spot Warning Yes Not confirmed
Cruise Control Yes Not confirmed
Drive Modes Yes Not confirmed
Driver Fatigue Alert Yes Not confirmed
Eco Mode Yes Not confirmed
Emergency Braking Yes Not confirmed
EV Mode Yes Not confirmed
Forward Collision Warning Yes Not confirmed
Front Camera Yes Not confirmed
Lane Departure Warning Yes Not confirmed
Lane Keep Assist Yes Not confirmed
Park Assist Yes Not confirmed
Parking Distance Sensors Front and Rear Not confirmed
Parking Sensor Front and Rear Not confirmed
Parking Sensors Front and Rear Not confirmed
Pre-Collision System Yes Not confirmed
Rain Sensor Wipers Yes Not confirmed
Rear View Camera Yes Not confirmed
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Yes Not confirmed
Rear Parking Sensors Yes Not confirmed
Rear View Camera Yes Not confirmed
Reverse Camera Yes Not confirmed
Reverse Camera Type Yes Not confirmed
Reversing Camera Yes Not confirmed
Sport Mode Yes Not confirmed
Surround View Camera Yes Not confirmed
Traffic Sign Recognition Yes Not confirmed

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tank 300 leads by 35 points

Tank 300 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Winner 74 /100
Lead 35 points
Data 97% confidence
74
#1 Winner

Tank 300

97% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Efficiency 33
Performance 82
Efficiency 33
Safety 100
Practicality 76
Ownership 65
Leads by 35 points
39
#2

XUV500

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +32 Efficiency XUV500 +17 Safety Tank 300 +100 Practicality Tank 300 +26 Ownership Tank 300 +15

High confidence result.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tank 300

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 33/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 65/100

XUV500

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM Tank 300 wins with 74 pts vs 39 pts for XUV500

In structured scoring, Tank 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, XUV500 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tank 300 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Tank 300 33 vs XUV500 50. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Tank 300 100, XUV500 0. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Tank 300 65, XUV500 50. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Tank 300 76, XUV500 50. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Tank 300 82, XUV500 50. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tank 300 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tank 300 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Tank 300 and XUV500 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Tank 300 scores 82 vs 50.

Efficiency: Tank 300 scores 33 vs 50.

Safety: Tank 300 scores 100 vs 0.

Practicality: Tank 300 scores 76 vs 50.

Ownership: Tank 300 scores 65 vs 50.

Final structured scoring gives Tank 300 the advantage in this comparison.