GWM Tank 300 vs Hyundai Tucson

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Plug-in Hybrid 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 35.7 km/l
VS
Hyundai Tucson in South Africa

Hyundai Tucson

2.0D AT Executive AWD Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 764,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 137 kW 🔧 416 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tank 300
Fuel Economy Tank 300
🛡 Safety Tank 300
📦 Practicality Tank 300
🔑 Ownership Tie
Tucson starts ZAR 131,000 cheaper Tank 300 from ZAR 699,900 · Tucson from ZAR 568,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Tank 300 Tucson
Maximum Power 240 kW @ 5500 rpm 137 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque 750 Nm 416 Nm @ 2000 rpm
Engine Size 1999 cc 1995 cc
Claimed Mileage 35.7 km/l 13.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 224 mm 181 mm
Boot / Load Bay 490 l 540 l
Airbags 8 6
Kerb Weight 2050 kg 1720 kg
Seating Capacity - -
Warranty 5 Years / 100,000 km 5

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tank 300 holds a noticeable edge over Tucson, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tank 300 +29 pts
Efficiency Tank 300 +41 pts
Safety Tank 300 +8 pts
Practicality Tank 300 +3 pts
Ownership Equal

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Tucson

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Tank 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Tucson

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Tank 300 Tucson
Hybrid System Plug-in Hybrid Not Applicable
Combined Power 255 kW Not Applicable
Combined Torque 615 Nm Not Applicable
Motor Type Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Number of Motors Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Motor Location Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Quarter Mile Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rev Limiter Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Power-to-Weight Ratio 124.4 kW/tonne 79.7 kW/tonne
Torque-to-Weight Ratio 300 Nm/tonne 241.9 Nm/tonne
Usable Battery Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Battery Voltage Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Electric Range 105 km Not Applicable
AC Charging Time Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
DC Charging Time Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Bore 82.5 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 Not Officially Disclosed
Cylinders 4 4
Drive Type AWD AWD
Engine Code GW4C20D Not Officially Disclosed
Engine Displacement 1999 cc 1995 cc
Fuel System Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Launch Control Yes Not Officially Disclosed
Maximum Torque 750 Nm 416 Nm @ 2000 rpm
Regenerative Braking Yes Not Applicable
Stroke 93.1 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Top Speed 195 km/h 195 km/h
Valves 16 16
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
AC Charging Power Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
0-100 km/h 5.8 sec 9.5 sec
Battery Capacity 19.1 kWh Not Applicable
Battery Type Lithium-ion Not Applicable
Cylinder Layout Inline Inline
DC Charging Power Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Drive Modes Not Officially Disclosed Eco, Normal
Engine 2-litre Turbocharged Petrol Plug-in Hybrid 2-litre Turbocharged Diesel
Fuel Type Plug-in Hybrid Diesel
Maximum Power 240 kW @ 5500 rpm 137 kW @ 3800 rpm
Transmission 8-Speed Automatic 8-Speed Automatic
Spec Tank 300 Tucson
360 Degree Camera Yes Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Yes
Around View Monitor Yes Yes
Attention Assist Yes -
Autonomous Emergency Braking Yes Yes
Automatic High Beam Yes -
Auto Highbeam Yes Not Available
Auto Lights Yes Yes
Auto Park Assist No -
Auto Wipers Yes No
Blind Spot Monitoring Yes Yes
Blind Spot Warning Yes Yes
Cruise Control Yes Yes
Driver Fatigue Alert Yes Not Available
Eco Mode Yes Yes
Emergency Braking Yes Yes
EV Mode Yes No
Forward Collision Warning Yes Not Available
Front Camera Yes -
Lane Departure Warning Yes Yes
Lane Keep Assist Yes Yes
Park Assist Yes Not Available
Parking Distance Sensors Front and Rear Front & Rear
Parking Sensors Front and Rear Front & Rear
Rain Sensor Wipers Yes No
Rear View Camera Yes Yes
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Yes Yes
Rear Parking Sensors Yes Front & Rear
Rear View Camera Yes Yes
Reverse Camera Yes Yes
Reverse Camera Type Yes Yes
Sport Mode Yes No
Surround View Camera Yes Yes
Traffic Sign Recognition Yes No
Parking Sensor Front and Rear Front & Rear
Pre-Collision System Yes Yes
Reversing Camera Yes Yes

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tank 300 leads by 16 points

Tank 300 holds a noticeable edge over Tucson, especially in key ownership areas.

Winner 88 /100
Lead 16 points
Data 97% confidence
88
#1 Winner

Tank 300

97% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 98
Efficiency 97
Safety 100
Practicality 76
Ownership 65
Leads by 16 points
72
#2

Tucson

91% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 56
Performance 69
Efficiency 56
Safety 92
Practicality 73
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +29 Efficiency Tank 300 +41 Safety Tank 300 +8 Practicality Tank 300 +3 Ownership Level

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tank 300

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 65/100

Tucson

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 73/100
Ownership 65/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM Tank 300 wins with 88 pts vs 72 pts for Tucson

In structured scoring, Tank 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Tucson may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tank 300 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Tank 300 97 vs Tucson 56. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Tank 300 100, Tucson 92. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Tank 300 65, Tucson 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Tank 300 76, Tucson 73. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Tank 300 98, Tucson 69. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tank 300 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tank 300 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Tank 300 and Tucson in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Tank 300 scores 98 vs 69.

Efficiency: Tank 300 scores 97 vs 56.

Safety: Tank 300 scores 100 vs 92.

Practicality: Tank 300 scores 76 vs 73.

Ownership: Tank 300 scores 65 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives Tank 300 the advantage in this comparison.