Jetour T2 vs GWM Tank 300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Jetour T2 in South Africa

Jetour T2

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD Petrol Automatic
ZAR 679,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 375 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
VS
GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 2.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tank 300
Fuel Economy T2
🛡 Safety Tank 300
📦 Practicality Tank 300
🔑 Ownership Tank 300
T2 starts ZAR 699900 cheaper T2 from ZAR 569,900 · Tank 300 from ZAR 699,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec T2 Tank 300
Engine Power 180 240
Torque 375 750
Engine Size 1998 1999
Claimed Mileage 9.3 2.8
Ground Clearance 220 224
Boot Space 580 490
Airbags Front, front side, and curtain airbags 8
Kerb Weight - 2050
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty - 5

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both T2 and Tank 300 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tank 300 +5 pts
Efficiency T2 +6 pts
Safety Tank 300 +6 pts
Practicality Tank 300 +2 pts
Ownership Tank 300 +9 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

T2

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

T2

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Tank 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec T2 Tank 300
Model Introduced Year 2026 2024
Generation Current local listing First generation, launched globally in 2021 and brought to South Africa in 2024. The Tank brand is positioned as GWM's premium off-road sub-brand alongside Haval (SUVs) and Ora (electric).
Facelift History Not listed by current South African source page. First-generation Tank 300 launched in South Africa in 2024. No significant facelift to date; software updates have refined the differential locking activation logic and refined the hybrid system on the Hi4-T variant.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year Current 2026
Production Status Active published
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - Crystal White, Hamilton Black, Mars Red, Atlantic Blue, Adventure Olive Green and Sand Dune Beige. The Adventure Olive Green is exclusive to Off-Road and Hi4-T Hybrid trims.
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec T2 Tank 300
Ground Clearance 220 mm 224 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 2750 mm
Length 4785 mm 4638 mm
Width 2006 mm 1926 mm
Height 1880 mm 1850 mm
Gross Vehicle Weight 2285 kg 2200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 580 l 490 l
Front Track Width 1685 mm 1560 mm
Rear Track Width 1695 mm 1570 mm
Load Bed Length Not Applicable Not Applicable
Load Bed Width Not Applicable Not Applicable
Boot Space Seats Folded 1494 l 690 l
Boot Volume 580 l 490 l
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 l 65 l
Gross Combined Mass Kg 3885 kg -
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2285 kg 2200 kg
Ground Clearance Mm 220 mm 224 mm
Height Mm 1880 mm 1850 mm
Length Mm 4785 mm 4638 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Not Applicable Not Applicable
Loadbox Width Mm Not Applicable Not Applicable
Cargo Volume 580 l 490 l
Width Mm 2006 mm 1926 mm
Number of Doors - 5
Doors - 5
Front Overhang - 880 mm
Ground Clearance Max 220 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance Min 220 mm 224 mm
Front Headroom - 990 mm
Rear Headroom - 960 mm
Kerb Weight - 2050 kg
Front Legroom - 1050 mm
Rear Legroom - 890 mm
Rear Overhang - 890 mm
Front Shoulder Room - 1430 mm
Rear Shoulder Room - 1390 mm
Tare Mass Kg - 2050 kg
Towing Capacity - 2500 kg
Tracking System - Optional
Turning Circle - 12.4 m
Turning Circle M - 12.4 m
Turning Radius - 12.4 m
Boot Space Seats Folded 1494 l 690 l
Max Payload - Not Applicable
Payload Kg - Not Applicable

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tank 300 leads by 4 points

Both T2 and Tank 300 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 74 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 97% confidence
74
#1 Winner

Tank 300

97% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Efficiency 33
Performance 82
Efficiency 33
Safety 100
Practicality 76
Ownership 65
Leads by 4 points
70
#2

T2

72% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 39
Performance 77
Efficiency 39
Safety 94
Practicality 74
Ownership 56
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +5 Efficiency T2 +6 Safety Tank 300 +6 Practicality Tank 300 +2 Ownership Tank 300 +9

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tank 300

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 33/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 65/100

T2

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 39/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 74/100
Ownership 56/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM Tank 300 wins with 74 pts vs 70 pts for T2

In structured scoring, Tank 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, T2 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tank 300 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: T2 39 vs Tank 300 33. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: T2 94, Tank 300 100. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: T2 56, Tank 300 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: T2 74, Tank 300 76. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: T2 77, Tank 300 82. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tank 300 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tank 300 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between T2 and Tank 300 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: T2 scores 77 vs 82.

Efficiency: T2 scores 39 vs 33.

Safety: T2 scores 94 vs 100.

Practicality: T2 scores 74 vs 76.

Ownership: T2 scores 56 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives Tank 300 the advantage in this comparison.