GWM Steed 6 vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM Steed 6 Discontinued model
GWM Steed 6 in South Africa

GWM Steed 6

2.0T Double Cab 4x4 Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 419,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 105 kW 🔧 310 Nm ⛽ 8.5 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

2.4L 4x2 GL M/T Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 81 kW 🔧 200 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM Steed 6 vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab: the short answer

Steed 6 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Triton Single Cab remains close.

Recorded price context Steed 6: last listed from ZAR 329,900 · Triton Single Cab: current from ZAR 499,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Steed 6 Triton Single Cab
Maximum Power Steed 6105 kW Triton Single Cab81 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque Steed 6310 Nm Triton Single Cab200 Nm @ 1000-3750 rpm
Engine Size Steed 61996 cc Triton Single Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Steed 68.5 km/l Triton Single Cab12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Steed 6200 mm Triton Single Cab200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for GWM Steed 6 2.0T Double Cab 4x4

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Steed 6

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Triton Single Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Steed 6

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Triton Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Steed 6 Triton Single Cab
Model Introduced Year 2013 2024
Generation Single generation in South Africa from 2013 to 2023, derived from Great Wall's mid-2010s bakkie platform. Discontinued in favour of the P Series and Cannon, which use the more modern POER platform. Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History Steed 6 received minor updates through its decade on sale — a 2017 specification refresh added the 6-speed automatic option and improved safety equipment levels, and a 2020 update added a touchscreen infotainment system with Bluetooth to upper trims. Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024.
Facelift Launched Since 2020 Current specification
Tare Mass Kg 1720 kg -
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Single-cab pickup
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed One-ton single-cab pickup
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Light commercial vehicle
Spec Steed 6 Triton Single Cab
Length 4970 mm 5320 mm
Width 1770 mm 1865 mm
Height 1700 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase 3030 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 l 75 l
Kerb Weight 1720 kg 1625 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 2570 kg
Payload Capacity 1000 kg 945 kg
Towing Capacity 2500 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1007 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm Not Applicable
Front Legroom 1100 mm 1059 mm
Rear Legroom 950 mm Not Applicable
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed 185 mm
Boot/Cargo Space Not confirmed 1904 l
Number of Rows Not confirmed 1 rows

In depth: how these cars differ

This Steed 6 and Triton Single Cab comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Steed 6 49 vs Triton Single Cab 34.

Efficiency index: Steed 6 37 vs Triton Single Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: Steed 6 58 vs Triton Single Cab 32.

Practicality index: Steed 6 75 vs Triton Single Cab 72.

Ownership-cover index: Steed 6 46 vs Triton Single Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Steed 6 leads by 8 points

Steed 6 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Triton Single Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 54 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 90% source coverage
54
#1 Evidence leader

Steed 6

90% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 75 Check Efficiency 37
Performance 49
Efficiency 37
Safety 58
Practicality 75
Ownership 46
Leads by 8 points
46
#2

Triton Single Cab

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 72 Check Safety 32
Performance 34
Efficiency 49
Safety 32
Practicality 72
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Steed 6 +15 Efficiency Triton Single Cab +12 Safety Steed 6 +26 Practicality Steed 6 +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Steed 6

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 37/100
Safety 58/100
Practicality 75/100
Ownership 46/100

Triton Single Cab

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 72/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM Steed 6 leads the specification evidence index with 54 pts vs 46 pts for Triton Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Steed 6 leads. However, Triton Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

Steed 6
Steed 6Discontinued
VS
P300
P300
Steed 6 vs P300 →
Steed 6
Steed 6Discontinued
VS
Pik Up Double Cab
Pik Up Double Cab
Steed 6 vs Pik Up Double Cab →
Steed 6
Steed 6Discontinued
VS
Tunland G7 Double Cab
Tunland G7 Double Cab
Steed 6 vs Tunland G7 Double Cab →
Steed 6
Steed 6Discontinued
VS
H-100 Tipper
H-100 Tipper
Steed 6 vs H-100 Tipper →
Steed 6
Steed 6Discontinued
VS
Navara Single Cab
Navara Single Cab
Steed 6 vs Navara Single Cab →
Steed 6
Steed 6Discontinued
VS
H-100 Deck
H-100 Deck
Steed 6 vs H-100 Deck →
Triton Single Cab
Triton Single Cab
VS
P300
P300
Triton Single Cab vs P300 →
Triton Single Cab
Triton Single Cab
VS
Pik Up Double Cab
Pik Up Double Cab
Triton Single Cab vs Pik Up Double Cab →

Steed 6 vs Triton Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.