Tata Harrier vs Mahindra Scorpio-N

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Tata Harrier in South Africa

Tata Harrier

Fearless+ DT AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 15.15 km/l
VS
Mahindra Scorpio-N in South Africa

Mahindra Scorpio-N

Z8L 4x4 AT Adventure Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 129 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Tata Harrier vs Mahindra Scorpio-N: the short answer

Harrier and Scorpio-N are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Scorpio-N starts ZAR 59,901 cheaper Harrier from ZAR 549,900 · Scorpio-N from ZAR 489,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Harrier Scorpio-N
Maximum Power Harrier125 kW @ 3750 rpm Scorpio-N128.6 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque Harrier350 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm Scorpio-N400 Nm
Engine Size Harrier1956 cc Scorpio-N2184 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Harrier15.15 km/l Scorpio-N14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Harrier205 mm Scorpio-N187 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Harrier

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Scorpio-N

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Harrier

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Scorpio-N

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Harrier Scorpio-N
Model Introduced Year 2025 Not Available
Generation Current-generation South African-market Tata Harrier five-seat SUV Current local listing
Facelift History Introduced with Tata Passenger Vehicles' South African return in 2025; no South African facelift has been announced Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment Mid-size SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Car SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1825-2070 kg
Spec Harrier Scorpio-N
Length 4605 mm 4662 mm
Width 1922 mm 1918 mm
Height 1718 mm 1905 mm
Wheelbase 2741 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 187 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 57 l
Boot/Cargo Space 445 l 460 l
Kerb Weight 1823 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2298 kg -
Payload Capacity 475 kg -
Towing Capacity 0 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m -
Front Headroom 1020 mm -
Rear Headroom 950 mm -
Front Legroom 840 mm -
Rear Legroom 980 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Harrier and Scorpio-N comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Harrier 60 vs Scorpio-N 69.

Efficiency index: Harrier 59 vs Scorpio-N 60.

Safety-equipment index: Harrier 99 vs Scorpio-N 90.

Practicality index: Harrier 67 vs Scorpio-N 78.

Ownership-cover index: Harrier not separately scored vs Scorpio-N not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Scorpio-N leads by 3 points

Harrier and Scorpio-N are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 54% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Scorpio-N

54% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 69
Efficiency 60
Safety 90
Practicality 78
Leads by 3 points
72
#2

Harrier

75% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 59
Performance 60
Efficiency 59
Safety 99
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Scorpio-N +9 Efficiency Scorpio-N +1 Safety Harrier +9 Practicality Scorpio-N +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Scorpio-N

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 78/100

Harrier

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mahindra Scorpio-N leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 72 pts for Harrier

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Scorpio-N leads. However, Harrier may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Harrier vs Scorpio-N questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.