Lexus RX vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Lexus RX in South Africa

Lexus RX

RX 350 F SPORT Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,642,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 205 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 11.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Current
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Lexus RX vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross: the short answer

RX holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Tiggo 4 Cross.

Tiggo 4 Cross starts ZAR 1,236,600 cheaper RX from ZAR 1,516,500 · Tiggo 4 Cross from ZAR 279,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification RX Tiggo 4 Cross
Maximum Power RX205 kW @ 6000 rpm Tiggo 4 Cross83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque RX430 Nm Tiggo 4 Cross170 Nm
Engine Size RX2400 cc Tiggo 4 Cross1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy RX11.5 km/l Tiggo 4 Cross14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance RX185 mm Tiggo 4 Cross180 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Lexus RX

RX 350 F SPORT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

RX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

RX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec RX Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2023 2026
Generation Fifth-generation Lexus RX luxury SUV Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History Current fifth-generation South African range with petrol, hybrid, performance-hybrid and plug-in-hybrid choices Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since Current fifth-generation South African range with petrol, hybrid, performance-hybrid and plug-in-hybrid choices 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17 Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Luxury SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1895-2005 kg 1309 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec RX Tiggo 4 Cross
Length 4890 mm 4351 mm
Width 1920 mm 1831 mm
Height 1695 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2850 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 185 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 67.5 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 612 l 340 l
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2590 kg 1684 kg
Towing Capacity 2000 kg 1300 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m 5.5 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 180 mm
Kerb Weight - 1309 kg
Payload Capacity - 375 kg
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1010 mm
Rear Headroom - 975 mm
Front Legroom - 1040 mm
Rear Legroom - 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This RX and Tiggo 4 Cross comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: RX 85 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 38.

Efficiency index: RX 46 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56.

Safety-equipment index: RX 93 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 91.

Practicality index: RX 75 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 55.

Ownership-cover index: RX not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RX leads by 17 points

RX holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Tiggo 4 Cross.

Evidence leader 77 /100
Lead 17 points
Data 70% source coverage
77
#1 Evidence leader

RX

70% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 85
Efficiency 46
Safety 93
Practicality 75
Leads by 17 points
60
#2

Tiggo 4 Cross

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RX +47 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross +10 Safety RX +2 Practicality RX +20

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RX

Performance 85/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 75/100

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus RX leads the specification evidence index with 77 pts vs 60 pts for Tiggo 4 Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RX leads. However, Tiggo 4 Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

RX
RX
VS
D90
D90
RX vs D90 →
RX
RX
VS
GLA
GLA
RX vs GLA →
RX
RX
VS
X2
X2
RX vs X2 →
RX
RX
VS
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tiggo 9 PHEV
RX vs Tiggo 9 PHEV →
RX
RX
VS
UX
UX
RX vs UX →
RX
RX
VS
Everest
Everest
RX vs Everest →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
D90
D90
Tiggo 4 Cross vs D90 →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
GLA
GLA
Tiggo 4 Cross vs GLA →

RX vs Tiggo 4 Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.