Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Tourneo Custom

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota RAV4 in South Africa

Toyota RAV4

2.5 HEV GR-S CVT Hybrid CVT Current
ZAR 941,800 ex-showroom
⚡ 137 kW 🔧 221 Nm ⛽ 21.3 km/l
VS
Ford Tourneo Custom in South Africa

Ford Tourneo Custom

2.0L SWB Titanium X 8AT Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,278,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 390 Nm ⛽ 13.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Tourneo Custom: the short answer

RAV4 and Tourneo Custom are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

RAV4 starts ZAR 465,500 cheaper RAV4 from ZAR 610,000 · Tourneo Custom from ZAR 1,075,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification RAV4 Tourneo Custom
Maximum Power RAV4137 kW @ 6000 rpm Tourneo Custom125 kW
Maximum Torque RAV4221 Nm Tourneo Custom390 Nm
Engine Size RAV42500 cc Tourneo Custom1996 cc
Combined Fuel Economy RAV421.3 km/l Tourneo Custom13.5 km/l
Ground Clearance RAV4186 mm Tourneo Custom130 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota RAV4

2.5 HEV GR-S CVT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Tourneo Custom

2.0L SWB Titanium X 8AT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.2/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

RAV4

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Tourneo Custom

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

RAV4

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Tourneo Custom

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec RAV4 Tourneo Custom
Model Introduced Year 2026 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation All-new sixth-generation RAV4 introduced in South Africa in July 2026 Current South African Tourneo Custom listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Full model change for 2026 with HEV, PHEV and GR-Sport derivatives Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Full model change for 2026 with HEV, PHEV and GR-Sport derivatives Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current South African 2026 specification Current
Body Style SUV MPV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Passenger van
Tare Mass Kg 1725-1740 kg Kerb not published; GVM 3200 kg
Vehicle Type SUV MPV
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Wheelbase Type - Short wheelbase
Spec RAV4 Tourneo Custom
Length 4645 mm 5050 mm
Width 1880 mm 2032 mm
Height 1680 mm 1979 mm
Wheelbase 2690 mm 3100 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 186 mm 130 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 732 l 482 l
Kerb Weight 1560 kg 1559 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2230 kg 3200 kg
Payload Capacity 460 kg 454 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 991 mm 996 mm
Rear Headroom 947 mm 957 mm
Front Legroom 1031 mm 1048 mm
Rear Legroom 882 mm 890 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This RAV4 and Tourneo Custom comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: RAV4 56 vs Tourneo Custom 66.

Efficiency index: RAV4 84 vs Tourneo Custom 57.

Safety-equipment index: RAV4 94 vs Tourneo Custom 93.

Practicality index: RAV4 68 vs Tourneo Custom 70.

Ownership-cover index: RAV4 not separately scored vs Tourneo Custom not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RAV4 leads by 3 points

RAV4 and Tourneo Custom are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 74% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

RAV4

74% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 56
Performance 56
Efficiency 84
Safety 94
Practicality 68
Leads by 3 points
72
#2

Tourneo Custom

71% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 57
Performance 66
Efficiency 57
Safety 93
Practicality 70
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tourneo Custom +10 Efficiency RAV4 +27 Safety RAV4 +1 Practicality Tourneo Custom +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RAV4

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 84/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 68/100

Tourneo Custom

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 70/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota RAV4 leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 72 pts for Tourneo Custom

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RAV4 leads. However, Tourneo Custom may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

RAV4 vs Tourneo Custom questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.