Rolls-Royce Ghost vs Rolls-Royce Phantom

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Rolls-Royce Ghost in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Ghost

Ghost Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 6.37 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Phantom in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Phantom

Phantom Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 900 Nm ⛽ 6.29 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Rolls-Royce Ghost vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: the short answer

Ghost and Phantom are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Ghost Phantom
Maximum Power Ghost420 kW @ 5000 rpm Phantom420 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque Ghost850 Nm @ 1600 rpm Phantom900 Nm @ 1700 rpm
Engine Size Ghost6749 cc Phantom6749 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Ghost6.37 km/l Phantom6.29 km/l
Ground Clearance Ghost118 mm Phantom136 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Ghost

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Phantom

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Ghost

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Phantom

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Ghost Phantom
Model Introduced Year 2020 2018
Generation Second-generation Ghost in standard-wheelbase Series II form Eighth-generation Phantom in standard-wheelbase Series II form
Facelift History The second-generation Ghost was introduced in South Africa in 2020 and evolved into Ghost Series II in October 2024 The eighth-generation Phantom was presented globally in 2017, introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its light-touch Series II evolution in 2022
Facelift Launched Since 2024 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Four-door luxury saloon Four-door luxury saloon
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Full-size super-luxury saloon Full-size super-luxury saloon
Vehicle Type Internal-combustion passenger car Internal-combustion passenger car
Spec Ghost Phantom
Length 5545 mm 5762 mm
Width 1998 mm 2018 mm
Height 1573 mm 1646 mm
Wheelbase 3295 mm 3552 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 118 mm 136 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 118 mm 136 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 l 90 l
Boot/Cargo Space 500 l 530 l
Kerb Weight 2490 kg 2560 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3130 kg 3235 kg
Payload Capacity 640 kg 675 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.5 m 6.55 m
Front Headroom 1030 mm 1046 mm
Rear Headroom 990 mm 978 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1041 mm
Rear Legroom 1075 mm 1105 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Ghost and Phantom comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Ghost 100 vs Phantom 96.

Efficiency index: Ghost 30 vs Phantom 29.

Safety-equipment index: Ghost 99 vs Phantom 95.

Practicality index: Ghost 64 vs Phantom 67.

Ownership-cover index: Ghost not separately scored vs Phantom not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Ghost leads by 1 points

Ghost and Phantom are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 79% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Ghost

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Efficiency 30
Performance 100
Efficiency 30
Safety 99
Practicality 64
Leads by 1 points
75
#2

Phantom

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 29
Performance 96
Efficiency 29
Safety 95
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ghost +4 Efficiency Ghost +1 Safety Ghost +4 Practicality Phantom +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Ghost

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 30/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 64/100

Phantom

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 29/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Ghost leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 75 pts for Phantom

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ghost leads. However, Phantom may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Ghost vs Phantom questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.