Nissan Patrol vs Mahindra XUV700

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Nissan Patrol Discontinued model
Nissan Patrol in South Africa

Nissan Patrol

5.6 V8 Platinum 4x4 7AT Petrol 7-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 1,949,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 298 kW 🔧 560 Nm ⛽ 9.0 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV700 in South Africa

Mahindra XUV700

AX7L BE Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 627,899 ex-showroom
⚡ 149 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Nissan Patrol vs Mahindra XUV700: the short answer

Patrol has a modest catalogue-index lead, while XUV700 remains close.

Recorded price context Patrol: last listed from ZAR 1,579,900 · XUV700: current from ZAR 495,199

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Patrol XUV700
Maximum Power Patrol298 kW XUV700149 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque Patrol560 Nm XUV700380 Nm
Engine Size Patrol5552 cc XUV7001997 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Patrol9.0 km/l XUV70013 km/l
Ground Clearance Patrol272 mm XUV700200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Nissan Patrol 5.6 V8 Platinum 4x4 7AT

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Patrol

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

XUV700

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Patrol

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

XUV700

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Patrol XUV700
Model Introduced Year 2013 Not Available
Facelift History 2019 mid-cycle facelift with revised front fascia and updated technology Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2019 Original current-generation version
Tare Mass Kg 2660 kg 2040 kg
Generation Not confirmed Current local listing
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed SUV
Model Year Not confirmed Current
Production Status Not confirmed Active
Segment Not confirmed SUV
Vehicle Type Not confirmed SUV
Spec Patrol XUV700
Length 5165 mm 4695 mm
Width 1995 mm 1890 mm
Height 1940 mm 1755 mm
Wheelbase 2850 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 272 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 140 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 490 l 240 l
Kerb Weight 2660 kg 2040 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3560 kg -
Towing Capacity 3500 kg -
Seating Capacity 8 seats 7 seats
Minimum Turning Radius 6.2 m -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Patrol and XUV700 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Patrol 97 vs XUV700 66.

Efficiency index: Patrol 37 vs XUV700 53.

Safety-equipment index: Patrol 98 vs XUV700 94.

Practicality index: Patrol 91 vs XUV700 67.

Ownership-cover index: Patrol not separately scored vs XUV700 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Patrol leads by 13 points

Patrol has a modest catalogue-index lead, while XUV700 remains close.

Evidence leader 84 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 78% source coverage
84
#1 Evidence leader

Patrol

78% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 37
Performance 97
Efficiency 37
Safety 98
Practicality 91
Leads by 13 points
71
#2

XUV700

58% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 66
Efficiency 53
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Patrol +31 Efficiency XUV700 +16 Safety Patrol +4 Practicality Patrol +24

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Patrol

Performance 97/100
Efficiency 37/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 91/100

XUV700

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Nissan Patrol leads the specification evidence index with 84 pts vs 71 pts for XUV700

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Patrol leads. However, XUV700 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Patrol vs XUV700 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.