Mitsubishi Outlander Sport vs Ford Puma

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford Puma Discontinued model
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Exceed 1.5L CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 141 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 459,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport vs Ford Puma: the short answer

Outlander Sport and Puma are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context Outlander Sport: current from ZAR 449,990 · Puma: last listed from ZAR 389,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Outlander Sport Puma
Maximum Power Outlander Sport77 kW @ 6000 rpm Puma92 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Outlander Sport141 Nm @ 4000 rpm Puma170 Nm
Engine Size Outlander Sport1499 cc Puma999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Outlander Sport16.1 km/l Puma16.4 km/l
Ground Clearance Outlander Sport193 mm Puma170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Outlander Sport

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Puma

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Outlander Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Puma

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Outlander Sport Puma
Model Introduced Year 2025 2023
Generation First South African Outlander Sport generation, Mitsubishi Xforce architecture First generation Puma in South Africa
Facelift History Introduced locally in January 2025 and replaced ASX. New model introduced in South Africa
Facelift Launched Since Current specification 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current 2024
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2021
Production Status active discontinued
Segment Compact SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1325 kg
Spec Outlander Sport Puma
Length 4390 mm 4186 mm
Width 1810 mm 1805 mm
Height 1660 mm 1531 mm
Wheelbase 2650 mm 2594 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 193 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 195 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 l 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 480 l 456 l
Kerb Weight 1250 kg 1325 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1730 kg 1775 kg
Payload Capacity 480 kg 450 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 950 mm 981 mm
Rear Headroom 880 mm 947 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1047 mm
Rear Legroom 370 mm 898 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Outlander Sport and Puma comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Outlander Sport 30 vs Puma 40.

Efficiency index: Outlander Sport 62 vs Puma 64.

Safety-equipment index: Outlander Sport 73 vs Puma 98.

Practicality index: Outlander Sport 67 vs Puma 59.

Ownership-cover index: Outlander Sport not separately scored vs Puma 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Puma leads by 4 points

Outlander Sport and Puma are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 91% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

Puma

91% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 64
Safety 98
Practicality 59
Ownership 43
Leads by 4 points
57
#2

Outlander Sport

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 62
Safety 73
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Puma +10 Efficiency Puma +2 Safety Puma +25 Practicality Outlander Sport +8

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Puma

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 64/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 59/100
Ownership 43/100

Outlander Sport

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Puma leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 57 pts for Outlander Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Puma leads. However, Outlander Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Outlander Sport vs Puma questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.