GWM ORA 5 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

GWM ORA 5 in South Africa

GWM ORA 5

BEV Ultra Luxury Electric Automatic
ZAR 599,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 260 Nm Nm
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance ORA 5
Fuel Economy ORA 5
🛡 Safety ORA 5
📦 Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross
🔑 Ownership ORA 5
Tiggo 4 Cross starts ZAR 364900 cheaper ORA 5 from ZAR 364,900 · Tiggo 4 Cross from ZAR 279,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec ORA 5 Tiggo 4 Cross
Engine Power 150 kW 83 kW
Torque 260 Nm 170 Nm
Engine Size - 1.5 cc
Claimed Mileage - 14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance - 180 mm
Boot / Load Bay - -
Airbags 6 Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight - -
Seating Capacity - 5
Warranty 7 years / 200,000 km 5 Years / 150 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

ORA 5 holds a noticeable edge over Tiggo 4 Cross, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance ORA 5 +18 pts
Efficiency ORA 5 +34 pts
Safety ORA 5 +17 pts
Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross +17 pts
Ownership ORA 5 +30 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

ORA 5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

ORA 5

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec ORA 5 Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation First-generation ORA 5; South African launch specification Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History No facelift; first South African model year Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since - 2026
Facelift Version Ending - Current
Body Style Compact SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status On sale active
Segment Compact SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Spec ORA 5 Tiggo 4 Cross
Wheelbase 2,720 mm 2610 mm
Length 4,471 mm 4351 mm
Width 1,833 mm 1831 mm
Height 1,641 mm 1662 mm
Load Bed Length - -
Load Bed Width - -
Fuel Tank Capacity - -
Height Mm 1,641 mm 1662 mm
Length Mm 4,471 mm 4351 mm
Loadbox Length Mm - -
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Width Mm 1,833 mm 1831 mm
Ground Clearance - 180 mm
Kerb Weight - -
Gross Vehicle Weight - 1701 kg
Seating Capacity - 5
Boot Space - -
Towing Capacity - -
Front Track Width - -
Rear Track Width - -
Turning Radius - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - -
Number of Doors - 5
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume - -
Doors - 5
Seats - 5
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - 1701 kg
Ground Clearance Max - 180 mm
Ground Clearance Min - 180 mm
Ground Clearance Mm - 180 mm
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume - -
Tare Mass Kg - -
Turning Circle - -
Turning Circle M - -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

ORA 5 leads by 15 points

ORA 5 holds a noticeable edge over Tiggo 4 Cross, especially in key ownership areas.

Winner 72 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 51% confidence
72
#1 Winner

ORA 5

51% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Practicality 50
Performance 56
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 50
Ownership 77
Leads by 15 points
57
#2

Tiggo 4 Cross

68% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 75 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 75
Practicality 67
Ownership 47
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance ORA 5 +18 Efficiency ORA 5 +34 Safety ORA 5 +17 Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross +17 Ownership ORA 5 +30

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

ORA 5

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 77/100

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 75/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 47/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM ORA 5 wins with 72 pts vs 57 pts for Tiggo 4 Cross

In structured scoring, ORA 5 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Tiggo 4 Cross may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the ORA 5 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: ORA 5 90 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: ORA 5 92, Tiggo 4 Cross 75. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: ORA 5 77, Tiggo 4 Cross 47. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: ORA 5 50, Tiggo 4 Cross 67. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: ORA 5 56, Tiggo 4 Cross 38. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The ORA 5 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The ORA 5 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between ORA 5 and Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: ORA 5 scores 56 vs 38.

Efficiency: ORA 5 scores 90 vs 56.

Safety: ORA 5 scores 92 vs 75.

Practicality: ORA 5 scores 50 vs 67.

Ownership: ORA 5 scores 77 vs 47.

Final structured scoring gives ORA 5 the advantage in this comparison.