Nissan NP200 vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW 🔧 147 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW 🔧 304 Nm ⛽ 11.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance NP300 Hardbody
Fuel Economy NP200
🛡 Safety Tie
📦 Practicality NP300 Hardbody
🔑 Ownership Tie
NP200 starts ZAR 349900 cheaper NP200 from ZAR 224,900 · NP300 Hardbody from ZAR 349,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec NP200 NP300 Hardbody
Engine Power 65 98
Torque 147 304
Engine Size 1598 2488
Claimed Mileage 12.5 11.4
Ground Clearance 185 215
Boot Space Not Applicable Not Applicable
Airbags 4 4
Kerb Weight 915 1395
Seating Capacity Available Available
Warranty 3 3

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100
+4
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

The Bottom Line

Both NP200 and NP300 Hardbody are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance NP300 Hardbody +4 pts
Efficiency NP200 +1 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality NP300 Hardbody +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

NP200

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

NP300 Hardbody

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec NP200 NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 185 215
Wheelbase 2400 2500
Length 4535 4875
Width 1615 1760
Height 1530 1655
Kerb Weight 915 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 1570 2400
Seating Capacity 2 5
Boot Space Not Applicable Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 500 2500
Front Track Width 1390 1495
Rear Track Width 1385 1490
Turning Radius 5.5 5.8
Load Bed Length 1815 1907
Load Bed Width 1530 1454
Number of Doors 5 5
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1500
Front Legroom Available Available
Rear Legroom Available Available
Front Headroom Available Available
Rear Headroom Available Available
Front Shoulder Room Available Available
Rear Shoulder Room Available Available
Max Payload Available Available
Boot Volume Available Available
Doors Available Available
Seats Available Available
Front Overhang Available Available
Fuel Tank Capacity Available Available
Rear Overhang Available Available
Spec NP200 NP300 Hardbody
Engine 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1598 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 65 98
Power @ RPM 5200 rpm 3600 rpm
Torque 147 304
Torque @ RPM 2800 rpm 1750-2500 rpm
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available Single Turbo
Top Speed 155 168
0-100 km/h 14.5 12.5
Compression Ratio 9.5:1 17.5:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Longitudinal
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard Standard
Cylinder Bore 82.0 82.0
Piston Stroke 92.0 92.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol Petrol
Engine Oil Capacity Available Available
Power 150 150
Variable Valve Timing Available Available
Maximum Engine RPM Available Available
Engine Type Config Available Available
0–100 km/h Available Available
Battery Capacity Available Available
Charging Port Available Available
AC Charging Time Available Available
Engine Displacement Available Available
EV Range Available Available

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Nissan NP300 Hardbody wins with 49 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, NP300 Hardbody emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the NP300 Hardbody edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: NP200 8 vs NP300 Hardbody 7. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: NP200 12, NP300 Hardbody 12. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: NP200 12, NP300 Hardbody 12. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: NP200 7, NP300 Hardbody 8. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: NP200 6, NP300 Hardbody 10. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The NP300 Hardbody edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The NP300 Hardbody scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between NP200 and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP200 scores 6 vs 10.

Efficiency: NP200 scores 8 vs 7.

Safety: NP200 scores 12 vs 12.

Practicality: NP200 scores 7 vs 8.

Ownership: NP200 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives NP300 Hardbody the advantage in this comparison.