Ford Mustang vs Rolls-Royce Phantom

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford Mustang : 5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Discontinued derivative
Ford Mustang in South Africa Model range image; trim may differ

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol 10-Speed Automatic Discontinued derivative
No longer sold new historical price not confirmed
Discontinued derivative Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 338 kW 🔧 515 Nm ⛽ 9.1 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Phantom in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Phantom

Phantom Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 900 Nm ⛽ 6.29 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Phantom
Fuel Economy Mustang
🛡 Safety Phantom
📦 Practicality Phantom
🔑 Ownership Phantom

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Mustang Phantom
Maximum Power 338 kW @ 7300 rpm 420 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque 515 Nm @ 4250 rpm 900 Nm @ 1700 rpm
Engine Size 4951 cc 6749 cc
Claimed Mileage 9.1 km/l 6.29 km/l
Ground Clearance 134 mm 136 mm
Boot / Load Bay 408 l 530 l
Airbags 8 8
Kerb Weight 1815 kg 2560 kg
Seating Capacity Not confirmed -
Warranty 3 4 years; regional conditions apply

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Both Mustang and Phantom are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Phantom +2 pts
Efficiency Mustang +8 pts
Safety Phantom +16 pts
Practicality Phantom +11 pts
Ownership Phantom +1 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Mustang

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Phantom

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Mustang

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Phantom

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Mustang Phantom
Model Introduced Year 2016 2018
Generation Seventh generation Mustang with S650 platform Eighth-generation Phantom in standard-wheelbase Series II form
Facelift History Latest generation introduced with improved tech and design The eighth-generation Phantom was presented globally in 2017, introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its light-touch Series II evolution in 2022
Tare Mass Kg 1815 kg -
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed 2022
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Four-door luxury saloon
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed Full-size super-luxury saloon
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Internal-combustion passenger car
Spec Mustang Phantom
Drivetrain Layout Rear Wheel Drive Front-engine, rear-wheel drive with all-wheel steering
LSD Available Electronic LSD -
Transfer Case Not Applicable Not Applicable
Differential Lock Not Applicable No lockable differential
Paddle Shifters Standard No
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -
Gearbox 10-Speed Automatic 8-speed ZF automatic
Transmission Type 10-Speed Automatic 8-speed ZF automatic
Gearbox Type 10-Speed Automatic 8-speed ZF automatic
Final Drive Ratio Not confirmed 2.81:1
Number of Gears Not confirmed 8
Clutch Type Not confirmed Torque converter
Drivetrain Not confirmed Rear-wheel drive
4WD Engagement Not confirmed Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Not confirmed Not Applicable
4WD Lo Range Not confirmed Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not confirmed Not Applicable
Automatic Shift Paddles Not confirmed No
Front Differential Lock Not confirmed Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not confirmed Not Applicable
Low Range Not confirmed Not Applicable
Axle Layout Not confirmed Rear-wheel-drive power delivery with active rear-axle steering
Rear Differential Lock Not confirmed No lockable differential
Transmission Speeds Not confirmed 8
Gear Shift Type Not confirmed Satellite Aided automatic gear selection

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Phantom leads by 5 points

Both Mustang and Phantom are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 71 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 91% confidence
71
#1 Winner

Phantom

91% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 29
Performance 96
Efficiency 29
Safety 99
Practicality 67
Ownership 44
Leads by 5 points
66
#2

Mustang

85% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 94 Check Efficiency 37
Performance 94
Efficiency 37
Safety 83
Practicality 56
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Phantom +2 Efficiency Mustang +8 Safety Phantom +16 Practicality Phantom +11 Ownership Phantom +1

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Phantom

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 29/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 44/100

Mustang

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 37/100
Safety 83/100
Practicality 56/100
Ownership 43/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Rolls-Royce Phantom wins with 71 pts vs 66 pts for Mustang

In structured scoring, Phantom emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Mustang may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Phantom edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Mustang 37 vs Phantom 29. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Mustang 83, Phantom 99. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Mustang 43, Phantom 44. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Mustang 56, Phantom 67. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Mustang 94, Phantom 96. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Phantom edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Phantom scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Mustang and Phantom in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 94 vs 96.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 37 vs 29.

Safety: Mustang scores 83 vs 99.

Practicality: Mustang scores 56 vs 67.

Ownership: Mustang scores 43 vs 44.

Final structured scoring gives Phantom the advantage in this comparison.