BMW M3 Sedan vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

BMW M3 Sedan in South Africa

BMW M3 Sedan

M3 Competition Sedan with M xDrive Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,190,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 390 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Current
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BMW M3 Sedan vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross: the short answer

M3 Sedan holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Tiggo 4 Cross.

Tiggo 4 Cross starts ZAR 1,910,100 cheaper M3 Sedan from ZAR 2,190,000 · Tiggo 4 Cross from ZAR 279,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification M3 Sedan Tiggo 4 Cross
Maximum Power M3 Sedan390 kW Tiggo 4 Cross83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque M3 Sedan650 Nm @ 2750-5730 rpm Tiggo 4 Cross170 Nm
Engine Size M3 Sedan2993 cc Tiggo 4 Cross1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy M3 Sedan12.5 km/l Tiggo 4 Cross14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance M3 Sedan140 mm Tiggo 4 Cross180 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

BMW M3 Sedan

M3 Competition Sedan with M xDrive

Hagalu editorial rating
3.9/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

M3 Sedan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

M3 Sedan

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec M3 Sedan Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2020 2026
Generation G80 four-door BMW M performance sedan, separate from the regular 3 Series range and from the Touring body. Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History Current G80-generation South African M3 Competition Sedan in all-wheel-drive form. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Premium Sedan SUV
Vehicle Type Car SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1309 kg
Spec M3 Sedan Tiggo 4 Cross
Length 4801 mm 4351 mm
Width 1903 mm 1831 mm
Height 1438 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2857 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 140 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 480 l 340 l
Kerb Weight 1855 kg 1309 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2260 kg 1684 kg
Payload Capacity 480 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1300 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 985 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 952 mm 975 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 895 mm 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This M3 Sedan and Tiggo 4 Cross comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: M3 Sedan 100 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 38.

Efficiency index: M3 Sedan 47 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56.

Safety-equipment index: M3 Sedan 92 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 91.

Practicality index: M3 Sedan 60 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 55.

Ownership-cover index: M3 Sedan not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

M3 Sedan leads by 17 points

M3 Sedan holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Tiggo 4 Cross.

Evidence leader 77 /100
Lead 17 points
Data 83% source coverage
77
#1 Evidence leader

M3 Sedan

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 100
Efficiency 47
Safety 92
Practicality 60
Leads by 17 points
60
#2

Tiggo 4 Cross

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance M3 Sedan +62 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross +9 Safety M3 Sedan +1 Practicality M3 Sedan +5

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

M3 Sedan

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 60/100

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW M3 Sedan leads the specification evidence index with 77 pts vs 60 pts for Tiggo 4 Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, M3 Sedan leads. However, Tiggo 4 Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
Santa Fe Hybrid
Santa Fe Hybrid
M3 Sedan vs Santa Fe Hybrid →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
CLA Electric
CLA ElectricUpcoming
M3 Sedan vs CLA Electric →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
iX1
iX1
M3 Sedan vs iX1 →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
X4
X4
M3 Sedan vs X4 →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
5 Series
5 Series
M3 Sedan vs 5 Series →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
bZ4X
bZ4X
M3 Sedan vs bZ4X →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
Santa Fe Hybrid
Santa Fe Hybrid
Tiggo 4 Cross vs Santa Fe Hybrid →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
CLA Electric
CLA ElectricUpcoming
Tiggo 4 Cross vs CLA Electric →

M3 Sedan vs Tiggo 4 Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.