Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Jetour T2 i-DM

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
VS
Jetour T2 i-DM in South Africa

Jetour T2 i-DM

T2 i-DM Plug-in Hybrid 3-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 779,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 100 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ 76.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Land Cruiser FJ
Fuel Economy T2 i-DM
🛡 Safety Land Cruiser FJ
📦 Practicality Land Cruiser FJ
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Land Cruiser FJ starts ZAR 65,900 cheaper Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000 · T2 i-DM from ZAR 779,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Land Cruiser FJ T2 i-DM
Maximum Power 122 kW @ 5200 rpm 100 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque 245 Nm @ 4000 rpm 220 Nm @ 2500 rpm
Engine Size 2700 cc 1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 9.3 km/l 76.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 245 mm 190 mm
Boot / Load Bay - 580 l
Airbags Curtain, Driver, Passenger, Driver Knee, Front Side Front, front side, and front/rear curtain airbags
Kerb Weight 1970 kg 2138 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 3 years / 100 000 km 7-year/200,000 km warranty

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Land Cruiser FJ and T2 i-DM are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Land Cruiser FJ +11 pts
Efficiency T2 i-DM +60 pts
Safety Land Cruiser FJ +1 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser FJ +10 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality
Catalogue-index leader

T2 i-DM

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

T2 i-DM

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser FJ T2 i-DM
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026 Current South African launch specification
Facelift History New South African model line launched in 2026 Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since New South African model line launched in 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current South African 2026 specification Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status published Active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1970 kg 2138 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 4038 kg
Spec Land Cruiser FJ T2 i-DM
Length 4610 mm 4785 mm
Width 1855 mm 2006 mm
Height 1890 mm 1875 mm
Wheelbase 2580 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 245 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 l 70 l
Kerb Weight 1970 kg 2138 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2500 kg 2438 kg
Towing Capacity 2500 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.7 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Boot/Cargo Space - 580 l
Payload Capacity - 300 kg
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1000 mm
Rear Headroom - 970 mm
Front Legroom - 980 mm
Rear Legroom - 810 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

T2 i-DM leads by 6 points

Land Cruiser FJ and T2 i-DM are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 73 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 66% source coverage
73
#1 Index leader

T2 i-DM

66% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 98 Check Performance 45
Performance 45
Efficiency 98
Safety 92
Practicality 66
Leads by 6 points
67
#2

Land Cruiser FJ

58% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 56
Efficiency 38
Safety 93
Practicality 76
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser FJ +11 Efficiency T2 i-DM +60 Safety Land Cruiser FJ +1 Practicality Land Cruiser FJ +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

T2 i-DM

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 98/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 66/100

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 76/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Jetour T2 i-DM leads the catalogue index with 73 pts vs 67 pts for Land Cruiser FJ

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, T2 i-DM leads. However, Land Cruiser FJ may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Land Cruiser FJ and T2 i-DM comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser FJ 56 vs T2 i-DM 45.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser FJ 38 vs T2 i-DM 98.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser FJ 93 vs T2 i-DM 92.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser FJ 76 vs T2 i-DM 66.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored vs T2 i-DM not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.