Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Comfort HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 439,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 310 Nm ⛽ 18.5 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Fuel Economy Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
🛡 Safety Land Cruiser FJ
📦 Practicality Land Cruiser FJ
🔑 Ownership Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV starts ZAR 714000 cheaper Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000 · Tiggo 4 Cross HEV from ZAR 439,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Land Cruiser FJ Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Engine Power 122 kW 150 kW
Torque 245 Nm 310 Nm
Engine Size 2700 cc 1.5 cc
Claimed Mileage 9.3 km/l 18.5 km/l
Ground Clearance 245 mm 180 mm
Boot / Load Bay - -
Airbags Curtain, Driver, Passenger, Driver Knee, Front Side Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 1970 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 3 years / 100 000 km 5 Years / 150 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Land Cruiser FJ and Tiggo 4 Cross HEV are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +6 pts
Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +37 pts
Safety Land Cruiser FJ +19 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser FJ +9 pts
Ownership Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +5 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser FJ Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026 Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross HEV range
Facelift History New South African model line launched in 2026 Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since New South African model line launched in 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current South African 2026 specification Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Land Cruiser FJ Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Ground Clearance 245 mm 180 mm
Wheelbase 2580 mm 2610 mm
Length 4610 mm 4351 mm
Width 1855 mm 1831 mm
Height 1890 mm 1662 mm
Kerb Weight 1970 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight 2500 kg 1905 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Towing Capacity 2500 kg -
Front Track Width 1540 mm -
Rear Track Width 1555 mm -
Turning Radius 5.5 m -
Load Bed Length - -
Load Bed Width - -
Number of Doors 5 5
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 l -
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2500 kg 1905 kg
Ground Clearance Max 245 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance Min 245 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 245 mm 180 mm
Height Mm 1890 mm 1662 mm
Length Mm 4610 mm 4351 mm
Loadbox Length Mm - -
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Tare Mass Kg 1970 kg -
Turning Circle 5.5 m -
Turning Circle M 5.5 m -
Width Mm 1855 mm 1831 mm
Boot Space - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - -
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume - -
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume - -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV leads by 2 points

Both Land Cruiser FJ and Tiggo 4 Cross HEV are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 67 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 68% confidence
67
#1 Winner

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

68% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 75 Check Ownership 55
Performance 62
Efficiency 75
Safety 75
Practicality 67
Ownership 55
Leads by 2 points
65
#2

Land Cruiser FJ

72% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 56
Efficiency 38
Safety 94
Practicality 76
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +6 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +37 Safety Land Cruiser FJ +19 Practicality Land Cruiser FJ +9 Ownership Tiggo 4 Cross HEV +5

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tiggo 4 Cross HEV

Performance 62/100
Efficiency 75/100
Safety 75/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 55/100

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Chery Tiggo 4 Cross HEV wins with 67 pts vs 65 pts for Land Cruiser FJ

In structured scoring, Tiggo 4 Cross HEV emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser FJ may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tiggo 4 Cross HEV edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Land Cruiser FJ 38 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 75. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Land Cruiser FJ 94, Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 75. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Land Cruiser FJ 50, Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 55. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Land Cruiser FJ 76, Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 67. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Land Cruiser FJ 56, Tiggo 4 Cross HEV 62. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tiggo 4 Cross HEV edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tiggo 4 Cross HEV scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Land Cruiser FJ and Tiggo 4 Cross HEV in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser FJ scores 56 vs 62.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser FJ scores 38 vs 75.

Safety: Land Cruiser FJ scores 94 vs 75.

Practicality: Land Cruiser FJ scores 76 vs 67.

Ownership: Land Cruiser FJ scores 50 vs 55.

Final structured scoring gives Tiggo 4 Cross HEV the advantage in this comparison.