Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab vs Isuzu MU-X

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
VS
Isuzu MU-X in South Africa

Isuzu MU-X

3.0 DDi LSE 4x4 AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 973,800 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab vs Isuzu MU-X: the short answer

MU-X has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab remains close.

MU-X starts ZAR 48,600 cheaper Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab from ZAR 801,000 · MU-X from ZAR 752,400

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab MU-X
Maximum Power Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab202 kW MU-X110 kW @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab381 Nm MU-X350 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab3956 cc MU-X3000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab13 km/l MU-X13.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab235 mm MU-X235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Isuzu MU-X

3.0 DDi LSE 4x4 AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

MU-X

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

MU-X

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab MU-X
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2013
Generation Current South African Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Current generation MU-X built on Isuzu D-Max platform
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Latest updates improved styling and safety tech
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Pickup 7-seat SUV
Body Type Cab Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name -
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. White, Black, Silver, Grey, Red
Dealer Stock Note Mid grade in the South Africa lineup Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 MY26
Production Status active active
Segment Pickup SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2050 kg 2080 kg
Vehicle Type Pickup SUV
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0 DDi LSE 4x4 AT
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 5900 kg
Spec Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab MU-X
Length 5270 mm 4850 mm
Width 1855 mm 1870 mm
Height 1855 mm 1825 mm
Wheelbase 3085 mm 2855 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 235 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 470 l 1119 l
Kerb Weight 2050 kg 2080 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3100 kg 2800 kg
Payload Capacity 1050 kg 659 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.4 m 11.4 m
Front Headroom 983 mm 1005 mm
Rear Headroom 951 mm 975 mm
Front Legroom 1033 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 886 mm 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab and MU-X comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 78 vs MU-X 63.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 49 vs MU-X 52.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 50 vs MU-X 93.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 85 vs MU-X 93.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 43 vs MU-X not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

MU-X leads by 13 points

MU-X has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 72% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

MU-X

72% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 63
Efficiency 52
Safety 93
Practicality 93
Leads by 13 points
63
#2

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

86% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 85 Check Ownership 43
Performance 78
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 85
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +15 Efficiency MU-X +3 Safety MU-X +43 Practicality MU-X +8

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

MU-X

Performance 63/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 93/100

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

Performance 78/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 85/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Isuzu MU-X leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 63 pts for Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, MU-X leads. However, Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab vs MU-X questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.