Renault Kwid vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Renault Kwid in South Africa

Renault Kwid

1.0L Evolution 5-Dr ABS Petrol 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 178,799 ex-showroom
⚡ 50 kW 🔧 91 Nm ⛽ 20.4 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Current
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Renault Kwid vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross: the short answer

Kwid and Tiggo 4 Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Kwid starts ZAR 101,101 cheaper Kwid from ZAR 178,799 · Tiggo 4 Cross from ZAR 279,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Kwid Tiggo 4 Cross
Maximum Power Kwid50 kW @ 5500 rpm Tiggo 4 Cross83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Kwid91 Nm @ 4250 rpm Tiggo 4 Cross170 Nm
Engine Size Kwid999 cc Tiggo 4 Cross1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Kwid20.4 km/l Tiggo 4 Cross14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance Kwid180 mm Tiggo 4 Cross180 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Renault Kwid

1.0L Evolution 5-Dr ABS

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Kwid

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Kwid

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Kwid Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Current South Africa Kwid range Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Hatchback SUV
Tare Mass Kg 736 kg 1309 kg
Vehicle Type Hatchback SUV
Spec Kwid Tiggo 4 Cross
Length 3731 mm 4351 mm
Width 1579 mm 1831 mm
Height 1513 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2422 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 180 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 28 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 279 l 340 l
Kerb Weight 736 kg 1309 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1168 kg 1684 kg
Payload Capacity 432 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1300 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.9 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 965 mm 975 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 850 mm 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Kwid and Tiggo 4 Cross comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Kwid 26 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 38.

Efficiency index: Kwid 76 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56.

Safety-equipment index: Kwid 91 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 91.

Practicality index: Kwid 52 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 55.

Ownership-cover index: Kwid not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Kwid leads by 0 points

Kwid and Tiggo 4 Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 60% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

Kwid

60% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 26
Performance 26
Efficiency 76
Safety 91
Practicality 52
Leads by 0 points
60
#2

Tiggo 4 Cross

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 4 Cross +12 Efficiency Kwid +20 Safety Level Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Kwid

Performance 26/100
Efficiency 76/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 52/100

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Renault Kwid leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 60 pts for Tiggo 4 Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Kwid leads. However, Tiggo 4 Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Kwid vs Tiggo 4 Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.