Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs Ford Ranger Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai IONIQ 5 Discontinued model
Hyundai IONIQ 5 in South Africa

Hyundai IONIQ 5

72kWh AWD Executive Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Discontinued model
ZAR 1,068,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 225 kW 🔧 605 Nm
VS
Ford Ranger Sport in South Africa

Ford Ranger Sport

2.3T EcoBoost Double Cab Sport 10AT 4x2 Petrol 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 839,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 222 kW 🔧 452 Nm ⛽ 10.8 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs Ford Ranger Sport: the short answer

IONIQ 5 and Ranger Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context IONIQ 5: last listed from ZAR 859,900 · Ranger Sport: current from ZAR 735,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification IONIQ 5 Ranger Sport
Maximum Power IONIQ 5225 kW Ranger Sport222 kW @ 5900 rpm
Maximum Torque IONIQ 5605 Nm Ranger Sport452 Nm
Engine Size IONIQ 5Not Applicable Ranger Sport2261 cc
Combined Fuel Economy IONIQ 5Not Applicable Ranger Sport10.8 km/l
Ground Clearance IONIQ 5160 mm Ranger Sport237 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Hyundai IONIQ 5

72kWh AWD Executive

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Ranger Sport

2.3T EcoBoost Double Cab Sport 10AT 4x2

Hagalu editorial rating
4.1/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

IONIQ 5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Ranger Sport

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

IONIQ 5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Ranger Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec IONIQ 5 Ranger Sport
Model Introduced Year 2022 2022
Generation First generation Ioniq 5 on Hyundai's dedicated E-GMP electric platform; 800V fast charging architecture allows rapid 18-minute charge from 10-80% at suitable DC fast chargers Current-generation Ford Ranger
Facelift History Launched in SA in 2022; updates to battery specifications and charging capabilities followed; the car has been on Hyundai SA's EV flagship from launch Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2022 Original current-generation version
Body Style SUV Pickup
Production Status discontinued active
Segment SUV Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 2190 kg 2055 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Pickup
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Type Cab Not confirmed Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note Not confirmed Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.3T EcoBoost Double Cab Sport 10AT 4x2
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Spec IONIQ 5 Ranger Sport
Length 4635 mm 5350 mm
Width 1890 mm 1918 mm
Height 1605 mm 1886 mm
Wheelbase 3000 mm 3270 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 237 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72.6 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 527 l 474 l
Kerb Weight 2190 kg 2055 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 3100 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1045 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 12.9 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1024 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 989 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1057 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 879 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This IONIQ 5 and Ranger Sport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: IONIQ 5 100 vs Ranger Sport 85.

Efficiency index: IONIQ 5 90 vs Ranger Sport 46.

Safety-equipment index: IONIQ 5 98 vs Ranger Sport 92.

Practicality index: IONIQ 5 70 vs Ranger Sport 85.

Ownership-cover index: IONIQ 5 65 vs Ranger Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

IONIQ 5 leads by 7 points

IONIQ 5 and Ranger Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 86 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 75% source coverage
86
#1 Evidence leader

IONIQ 5

75% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 98
Practicality 70
Ownership 65
Leads by 7 points
79
#2

Ranger Sport

68% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 85
Efficiency 46
Safety 92
Practicality 85
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance IONIQ 5 +15 Efficiency IONIQ 5 +44 Safety IONIQ 5 +6 Practicality Ranger Sport +15

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

IONIQ 5

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 70/100
Ownership 65/100

Ranger Sport

Performance 85/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 85/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai IONIQ 5 leads the specification evidence index with 86 pts vs 79 pts for Ranger Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, IONIQ 5 leads. However, Ranger Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

IONIQ 5
IONIQ 5Discontinued
VS
Tayron
Tayron
IONIQ 5 vs Tayron →
IONIQ 5
IONIQ 5Discontinued
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
IONIQ 5 vs Hunter K50 REEV →
IONIQ 5
IONIQ 5Discontinued
VS
H6 GT PHEV
H6 GT PHEV
IONIQ 5 vs H6 GT PHEV →
IONIQ 5
IONIQ 5Discontinued
VS
P500
P500
IONIQ 5 vs P500 →
IONIQ 5
IONIQ 5Discontinued
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
IONIQ 5 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab →
IONIQ 5
IONIQ 5Discontinued
VS
CX-60
CX-60
IONIQ 5 vs CX-60 →
Ranger Sport
Ranger Sport
VS
Tayron
Tayron
Ranger Sport vs Tayron →
Ranger Sport
Ranger Sport
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
Ranger Sport vs Hunter K50 REEV →

IONIQ 5 vs Ranger Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.