Suzuki Ignis vs Ford Ranger XLT

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Ignis in South Africa

Suzuki Ignis

1.2 GLX AMT Petrol 5-Speed AMT Current
ZAR 293,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 60 kW 🔧 113 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Ford Ranger XLT in South Africa

Ford Ranger XLT

2.0 SiT Double Cab XLT 10AT 4x4 Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 788,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 405 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Ignis vs Ford Ranger XLT: the short answer

Ranger XLT holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Ignis.

Ignis starts ZAR 417,100 cheaper Ignis from ZAR 237,900 · Ranger XLT from ZAR 655,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Ignis Ranger XLT
Maximum Power Ignis60 kW Ranger XLT125 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque Ignis113 Nm Ranger XLT405 Nm
Engine Size Ignis1197 cc Ranger XLT1996 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Ignis18.2 km/l Ranger XLT13 km/l
Ground Clearance Ignis0 mm Ranger XLT237 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Suzuki Ignis

1.2 GLX AMT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Ranger XLT

2.0 SiT Double Cab XLT 10AT 4x4

Hagalu editorial rating
4.2/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Ignis

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Ranger XLT

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Ignis

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Ranger XLT

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Ignis Ranger XLT
Model Introduced Year 2026 2022
Generation Current market generation Current-generation Ford Ranger
Facelift History Current market specification Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Pickup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Hatchback Pickup
Vehicle Type Hatchback Pickup
Body Type Cab - Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.0 SiT Double Cab XLT 10AT 4x4
Tare Mass Kg - 2177 kg
Spec Ignis Ranger XLT
Length 3700 mm 5350 mm
Width 1690 mm 1918 mm
Height 1595 mm 1886 mm
Wheelbase 2435 mm 3270 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 237 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 32 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 260 l 479 l
Kerb Weight 865 kg 2177 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1330 kg 3230 kg
Payload Capacity 465 kg 1053 kg
Towing Capacity 500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 12.9 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1024 mm
Rear Headroom 950 mm 989 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1057 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 879 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Ignis and Ranger XLT comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Ignis 23 vs Ranger XLT 70.

Efficiency index: Ignis 69 vs Ranger XLT 55.

Safety-equipment index: Ignis 87 vs Ranger XLT 92.

Practicality index: Ignis 42 vs Ranger XLT 85.

Ownership-cover index: Ignis not separately scored vs Ranger XLT not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Ranger XLT leads by 23 points

Ranger XLT holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Ignis.

Evidence leader 77 /100
Lead 23 points
Data 69% source coverage
77
#1 Evidence leader

Ranger XLT

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 55
Performance 70
Efficiency 55
Safety 92
Practicality 85
Leads by 23 points
54
#2

Ignis

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 23
Performance 23
Efficiency 69
Safety 87
Practicality 42
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger XLT +47 Efficiency Ignis +14 Safety Ranger XLT +5 Practicality Ranger XLT +43

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Ranger XLT

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 55/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 85/100

Ignis

Performance 23/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 42/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Ranger XLT leads the specification evidence index with 77 pts vs 54 pts for Ignis

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ranger XLT leads. However, Ignis may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Ignis
Ignis
VS
Hunter Diesel
Hunter Diesel
Ignis vs Hunter Diesel →
Ignis
Ignis
VS
Navara Single Cab
Navara Single Cab
Ignis vs Navara Single Cab →
Ignis
Ignis
VS
H-100 Tipper
H-100 Tipper
Ignis vs H-100 Tipper →
Ignis
Ignis
VS
D-Max Single Cab
D-Max Single Cab
Ignis vs D-Max Single Cab →
Ignis
Ignis
VS
Swift Sport
Swift Sport
Ignis vs Swift Sport →
Ignis
Ignis
VS
P300
P300
Ignis vs P300 →
Ranger XLT
Ranger XLT
VS
Hunter Diesel
Hunter Diesel
Ranger XLT vs Hunter Diesel →
Ranger XLT
Ranger XLT
VS
Navara Single Cab
Navara Single Cab
Ranger XLT vs Navara Single Cab →

Ignis vs Ranger XLT questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.