Hyundai i20 vs Mitsubishi Outlander

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai i20 in South Africa

Hyundai i20

1.0T Fluid Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 328,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 74 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander

2.5L Exceed CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 819,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai i20 vs Mitsubishi Outlander: the short answer

i20 and Outlander are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

i20 starts ZAR 463,095 cheaper i20 from ZAR 296,900 · Outlander from ZAR 759,995

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification i20 Outlander
Maximum Power i2074 kW @ 5500 rpm Outlander135 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque i20172 Nm @ 1500 rpm Outlander245 Nm @ 3600 rpm
Engine Size i20998 cc Outlander2488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy i2014.5 km/l Outlander12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance i20195 mm Outlander210 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Hyundai i20

1.0T Fluid

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mitsubishi Outlander

2.5L Exceed CVT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

i20

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Outlander

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

i20

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Outlander

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec i20 Outlander
Model Introduced Year 2008 2022
Generation Third generation i20 on the K2 platform; sold in SA with 1.0T three-cylinder turbo across all variants Fourth-generation Outlander
Facelift History Third generation launched globally in 2020 and arrived in SA shortly after; significant improvement over the second gen in styling, tech, and driving dynamics Current 2026 South African specification including Edition 25.
Facelift Launched Since 2020 Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Blue, Red, Yellow -
Dealer Stock Note Fluid grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Hatchback Medium seven-seat SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1135 kg -
Vehicle Type Hatchback Passenger vehicle
Spec i20 Outlander
Length 4040 mm 4710 mm
Width 1775 mm 1862 mm
Height 1505 mm 1745 mm
Wheelbase 2580 mm 2706 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 195 mm 210 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 352 l 205 l
Kerb Weight 1135 kg 1690 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1610 kg 2355 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg 665 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 986 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 950 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1058 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1014 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This i20 and Outlander comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: i20 37 vs Outlander 56.

Efficiency index: i20 59 vs Outlander 49.

Safety-equipment index: i20 84 vs Outlander 76.

Practicality index: i20 61 vs Outlander 64.

Ownership-cover index: i20 65 vs Outlander not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Outlander leads by 1 points

i20 and Outlander are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 62 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 83% source coverage
62
#1 Evidence leader

Outlander

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 56
Efficiency 49
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Leads by 1 points
61
#2

i20

93% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 37
Performance 37
Efficiency 59
Safety 84
Practicality 61
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Outlander +19 Efficiency i20 +10 Safety i20 +8 Practicality Outlander +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Outlander

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

i20

Performance 37/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Outlander leads the specification evidence index with 62 pts vs 61 pts for i20

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Outlander leads. However, i20 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

i20 vs Outlander questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.