GWM H6 GT vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

GWM H6 GT in South Africa

GWM H6 GT

2.0T Hybrid LT Hybrid Current
ZAR 769,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 420 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,065,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Land Cruiser 76
Fuel Economy H6 GT
🛡 Safety H6 GT
📦 Practicality Land Cruiser 76
🔑 Ownership H6 GT
H6 GT starts ZAR 280,100 cheaper H6 GT from ZAR 699,900 · Land Cruiser 76 from ZAR 980,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec H6 GT Land Cruiser 76
Maximum Power 150 kW @ 5500 rpm 202 kW
Maximum Torque 420 Nm 381 Nm
Engine Size 1999 cc 3956 cc
Claimed Mileage 16.1 km/l 13 km/l
Ground Clearance 192 mm 230 mm
Boot / Load Bay 460 l 909 l
Airbags 6 2
Kerb Weight 1740 kg 2100 kg
Seating Capacity - -
Warranty 5 Years / 100,000 km 3 years / 100 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

H6 GT has a slight advantage, but Land Cruiser 76 remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Land Cruiser 76 +7 pts
Efficiency H6 GT +18 pts
Safety H6 GT +49 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +31 pts
Ownership H6 GT +21 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

H6 GT

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Land Cruiser 76

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

H6 GT

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Land Cruiser 76

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec H6 GT Land Cruiser 76
Hybrid System Parallel Hybrid Not Applicable
Combined Power 180 kW Not Applicable
Combined Torque Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Number of Motors Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Motor Location Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Quarter Mile Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rev Limiter Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Power-to-Weight Ratio 103.4 kW/tonne 96.2 kW/tonne
Torque-to-Weight Ratio Not Officially Disclosed 181.4 Nm/tonne
Usable Battery Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Electric Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
AC Charging Time Not Applicable Not Applicable
DC Charging Time Not Applicable Not Applicable
AC Charging Power Not Applicable Not Applicable
Aspiration Turbocharged Naturally Aspirated
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 Not Officially Disclosed
Cylinders 4 6
DC Charging Power Not Applicable Not Applicable
Drive Type FWD 4WD
Engine Code GW4C20B Not Officially Disclosed
Engine Displacement 1999 cc 3956 cc
Fuel System Direct Injection Multi-Point Injection
Fuel Type Hybrid Petrol
Launch Control No Not Officially Disclosed
Regenerative Braking Yes Not Applicable
Top Speed 200 km/h 175 km/h
Valves 16 24
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Engine 2-litre Turbocharged Petrol Hybrid 4-litre Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Maximum Torque 420 Nm 381 Nm
0-100 km/h 8.2 sec 9.8 sec
Battery Capacity 1.8 kWh Not Applicable
Battery Type Lithium-ion Not Applicable
Battery Voltage Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Cylinder Layout Inline Not Officially Disclosed
Drive Modes Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Maximum Power 150 kW @ 5500 rpm 202 kW
Motor Type Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Transmission Not Officially Disclosed 4-Speed Automatic
Bore Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Stroke Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Spec H6 GT Land Cruiser 76
360 Degree Camera Yes Not Available
Active Engine Braking No -
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Not Available
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Not Available
Around View Monitor Yes Not Available
Attention Assist Yes -
Autonomous Emergency Braking Yes Not Available
Automatic High Beam Yes -
Auto Highbeam Yes Not Available
Auto Lights Yes Not Available
Auto Park Assist No -
Auto Wipers Yes Not Available
Blind Spot Monitoring Yes Not Available
Blind Spot Warning Yes Not Available
Cruise Control Yes Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert Yes Not Available
Eco Mode Yes -
Emergency Braking Yes Not Available
EV Mode Yes Not Available
Forward Collision Warning Yes Not Available
Front Camera Yes -
Lane Departure Warning Yes Not Available
Lane Keep Assist Yes Not Available
Park Assist Yes Not Available
Parking Distance Sensors Front and Rear Not Available
Parking Sensor Front and Rear Not Available
Parking Sensors Front and Rear Not Available
Pre-Collision System Yes Not Available
Rain Sensor Wipers Yes Not Available
Rear View Camera Yes Not Available
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Yes Not Available
Rear Parking Sensors Yes Not Available
Rear View Camera Yes Not Available
Reverse Camera Yes Not Available
Reverse Camera Type Yes Not Available
Reversing Camera Yes Not Available
Sport Mode Yes -
Surround View Camera Yes Not Available
Traffic Sign Recognition Yes Not Available

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

H6 GT leads by 9 points

H6 GT has a slight advantage, but Land Cruiser 76 remains highly competitive.

Winner 73 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 97% confidence
73
#1 Winner

H6 GT

97% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Practicality 65
Performance 70
Efficiency 67
Safety 94
Practicality 65
Ownership 65
Leads by 9 points
64
#2

Land Cruiser 76

95% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 96 Check Ownership 44
Performance 77
Efficiency 49
Safety 45
Practicality 96
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 76 +7 Efficiency H6 GT +18 Safety H6 GT +49 Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +31 Ownership H6 GT +21

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

H6 GT

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 65/100

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 96/100
Ownership 44/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM H6 GT wins with 73 pts vs 64 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In structured scoring, H6 GT emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 76 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the H6 GT edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: H6 GT 67 vs Land Cruiser 76 49. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: H6 GT 94, Land Cruiser 76 45. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: H6 GT 65, Land Cruiser 76 44. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: H6 GT 65, Land Cruiser 76 96. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: H6 GT 70, Land Cruiser 76 77. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The H6 GT edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The H6 GT scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between H6 GT and Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: H6 GT scores 70 vs 77.

Efficiency: H6 GT scores 67 vs 49.

Safety: H6 GT scores 94 vs 45.

Practicality: H6 GT scores 65 vs 96.

Ownership: H6 GT scores 65 vs 44.

Final structured scoring gives H6 GT the advantage in this comparison.