GWM H2 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM H2 Discontinued model
GWM H2 in South Africa

GWM H2

1.5T LT Petrol 6-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 339,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 7.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Current
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM H2 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross: the short answer

H2 and Tiggo 4 Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context H2: last listed from ZAR 299,900 · Tiggo 4 Cross: current from ZAR 279,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification H2 Tiggo 4 Cross
Maximum Power H2110 kW @ 5500 rpm Tiggo 4 Cross83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque H2210 Nm Tiggo 4 Cross170 Nm
Engine Size H21497 cc Tiggo 4 Cross1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy H27.5 km/l Tiggo 4 Cross14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance H2175 mm Tiggo 4 Cross180 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for GWM H2 1.5T LT

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

H2

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

H2

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec H2 Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2017 2026
Generation First generation Haval H2 in SA, on sale 2017-2022. Discontinued in favour of the Jolion, which used a more modern platform and powertrain. Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History H2 received a mid-cycle update in 2019 that brought minor exterior styling changes, improved infotainment software and refinements to the DCT calibration. Updates continued through the model life to address recurring DCT issues, with the final 2022 specification being notably improved over the original 2017 launch model. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2026
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed SUV
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed SUV
Tare Mass Kg Not confirmed 1309 kg
Vehicle Type Not confirmed SUV
Spec H2 Tiggo 4 Cross
Length 4290 mm 4351 mm
Width 1800 mm 1831 mm
Height 1645 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 51 l
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1800 kg 1684 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 990 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 960 mm 975 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 870 mm 930 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed 180 mm
Boot/Cargo Space Not confirmed 340 l
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 1309 kg
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 375 kg
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 1300 kg
Number of Rows Not confirmed 2 rows

In depth: how these cars differ

This H2 and Tiggo 4 Cross comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: H2 45 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 38.

Efficiency index: H2 35 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56.

Safety-equipment index: H2 72 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 91.

Practicality index: H2 66 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 55.

Ownership-cover index: H2 44 vs Tiggo 4 Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 4 Cross leads by 6 points

H2 and Tiggo 4 Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 65% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 4 Cross

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Leads by 6 points
54
#2

H2

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 72 Check Efficiency 35
Performance 45
Efficiency 35
Safety 72
Practicality 66
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance H2 +7 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross +21 Safety Tiggo 4 Cross +19 Practicality H2 +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

H2

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 35/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 44/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 4 Cross leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 54 pts for H2

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 4 Cross leads. However, H2 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

H2
H2Discontinued
VS
ZS
ZS
H2 vs ZS →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
L4
L4
H2 vs L4 →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Fronx
Fronx
H2 vs Fronx →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Starlet Cross
Starlet Cross
H2 vs Starlet Cross →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Tiggo 4 Pro
Tiggo 4 Pro
H2 vs Tiggo 4 Pro →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
EXTER
EXTER
H2 vs EXTER →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
ZS
ZS
Tiggo 4 Cross vs ZS →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
L4
L4
Tiggo 4 Cross vs L4 →

H2 vs Tiggo 4 Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.