GWM H2 vs Ford Territory

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM H2 Discontinued model
GWM H2 in South Africa

GWM H2

1.5T LT Petrol 6-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 339,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 7.5 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Titanium DCT Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 643,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 318 Nm ⛽ 13.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM H2 vs Ford Territory: the short answer

Territory has a modest catalogue-index lead, while H2 remains close.

Recorded price context H2: last listed from ZAR 299,900 · Territory: current from ZAR 534,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification H2 Territory
Maximum Power H2110 kW @ 5500 rpm Territory138 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque H2210 Nm Territory318 Nm @ 1750-3000 rpm
Engine Size H21497 cc Territory1799 cc
Combined Fuel Economy H27.5 km/l Territory13.5 km/l
Ground Clearance H2175 mm Territory190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

GWM H2

1.5T LT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Territory

1.8T Titanium DCT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.1/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

H2

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Territory

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

H2

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Territory

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec H2 Territory
Model Introduced Year 2017 2024
Generation First generation Haval H2 in SA, on sale 2017-2022. Discontinued in favour of the Jolion, which used a more modern platform and powertrain. First-generation South African Territory, 2026 update
Facelift History H2 received a mid-cycle update in 2019 that brought minor exterior styling changes, improved infotainment software and refinements to the DCT calibration. Updates continued through the model life to address recurring DCT issues, with the final 2022 specification being notably improved over the original 2017 launch model. 2026 South African design and equipment update
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note Not confirmed White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Tare Mass Kg Not confirmed 1705 kg
Spec H2 Territory
Length 4290 mm 4685 mm
Width 1800 mm 1935 mm
Height 1645 mm 1706 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 2726 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 l 448 l
Kerb Weight 1650 kg 1705 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1800 kg 2025 kg
Payload Capacity 550 kg 320 kg
Towing Capacity 2000 kg 1310 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.68 m
Front Headroom 990 mm 997 mm
Rear Headroom 960 mm 971 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1034 mm
Rear Legroom 870 mm 956 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This H2 and Territory comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: H2 45 vs Territory 63.

Efficiency index: H2 35 vs Territory 53.

Safety-equipment index: H2 73 vs Territory 90.

Practicality index: H2 65 vs Territory 60.

Ownership-cover index: H2 44 vs Territory not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Territory leads by 13 points

Territory has a modest catalogue-index lead, while H2 remains close.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 80% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

Territory

80% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 63
Efficiency 53
Safety 90
Practicality 60
Leads by 13 points
54
#2

H2

95% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Efficiency 35
Performance 45
Efficiency 35
Safety 73
Practicality 65
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Territory +18 Efficiency Territory +18 Safety Territory +17 Practicality H2 +5

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Territory

Performance 63/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 60/100

H2

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 35/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 44/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Territory leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 54 pts for H2

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Territory leads. However, H2 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
H2 vs Corolla Cross →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Jolion
Jolion
H2 vs Jolion →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
X55 Plus
X55 Plus
H2 vs X55 Plus →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
H2 vs Tiggo 7 →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
CS75 Pro
CS75 Pro
H2 vs CS75 Pro →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Jolion Pro Limited
Jolion Pro Limited
H2 vs Jolion Pro Limited →
Territory
Territory
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
Territory vs Corolla Cross →
Territory
Territory
VS
Jolion
Jolion
Territory vs Jolion →

H2 vs Territory questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.