GWM H2 vs Tata Harrier

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM H2 Discontinued model
GWM H2 in South Africa

GWM H2

1.5T LT Petrol 6-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 339,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 7.5 km/l
VS
Tata Harrier in South Africa

Tata Harrier

Fearless+ DT AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 15.15 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM H2 vs Tata Harrier: the short answer

Harrier holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H2.

Recorded price context H2: last listed from ZAR 299,900 · Harrier: current from ZAR 549,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification H2 Harrier
Maximum Power H2110 kW @ 5500 rpm Harrier125 kW @ 3750 rpm
Maximum Torque H2210 Nm Harrier350 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm
Engine Size H21497 cc Harrier1956 cc
Combined Fuel Economy H27.5 km/l Harrier15.15 km/l
Ground Clearance H2175 mm Harrier205 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

GWM H2

1.5T LT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Tata Harrier

Fearless+ DT AT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.5/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

H2

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Harrier

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

H2

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Harrier

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec H2 Harrier
Model Introduced Year 2017 2025
Generation First generation Haval H2 in SA, on sale 2017-2022. Discontinued in favour of the Jolion, which used a more modern platform and powertrain. Current-generation South African-market Tata Harrier five-seat SUV
Facelift History H2 received a mid-cycle update in 2019 that brought minor exterior styling changes, improved infotainment software and refinements to the DCT calibration. Updates continued through the model life to address recurring DCT issues, with the final 2022 specification being notably improved over the original 2017 launch model. Introduced with Tata Passenger Vehicles' South African return in 2025; no South African facelift has been announced
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active Active
Segment SUV Mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger Car
Spec H2 Harrier
Length 4290 mm 4605 mm
Width 1800 mm 1922 mm
Height 1645 mm 1718 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 2741 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 205 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 l 445 l
Kerb Weight 1650 kg 1823 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1800 kg 2298 kg
Payload Capacity 550 kg 475 kg
Towing Capacity 2000 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.8 m
Front Headroom 990 mm 1020 mm
Rear Headroom 960 mm 950 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 840 mm
Rear Legroom 870 mm 980 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This H2 and Harrier comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: H2 45 vs Harrier 60.

Efficiency index: H2 35 vs Harrier 59.

Safety-equipment index: H2 73 vs Harrier 99.

Practicality index: H2 65 vs Harrier 67.

Ownership-cover index: H2 44 vs Harrier not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Harrier leads by 18 points

Harrier holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H2.

Evidence leader 72 /100
Lead 18 points
Data 75% source coverage
72
#1 Evidence leader

Harrier

75% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 59
Performance 60
Efficiency 59
Safety 99
Practicality 67
Leads by 18 points
54
#2

H2

95% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Efficiency 35
Performance 45
Efficiency 35
Safety 73
Practicality 65
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Harrier +15 Efficiency Harrier +24 Safety Harrier +26 Practicality Harrier +2

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Harrier

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 67/100

H2

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 35/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 44/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Tata Harrier leads the specification evidence index with 72 pts vs 54 pts for H2

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Harrier leads. However, H2 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
H2 vs Corolla Cross →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
X55 Plus
X55 Plus
H2 vs X55 Plus →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
H2 vs Tiggo 7 →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
CS75 Pro
CS75 Pro
H2 vs CS75 Pro →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Jolion Pro Limited
Jolion Pro Limited
H2 vs Jolion Pro Limited →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
H2 vs Jimny 5-Door →
Harrier
Harrier
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
Harrier vs Corolla Cross →
Harrier
Harrier
VS
X55 Plus
X55 Plus
Harrier vs X55 Plus →

H2 vs Harrier questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.