Lexus GX vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Lexus GX in South Africa

Lexus GX

GX 550 Overtrail Petrol 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,856,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 260 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 8.1 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Lexus GX vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ: the short answer

GX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser FJ remains close.

Land Cruiser FJ starts ZAR 1,142,600 cheaper GX from ZAR 1,856,600 · Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GX Land Cruiser FJ
Maximum Power GX260 kW Land Cruiser FJ122 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque GX650 Nm Land Cruiser FJ245 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size GX3500 cc Land Cruiser FJ2700 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GX8.1 km/l Land Cruiser FJ9.3 km/l
Ground Clearance GX220 mm Land Cruiser FJ245 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

GX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

GX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GX Land Cruiser FJ
Model Introduced Year 2025 2026
Generation Third-generation Lexus GX 550 body-on-frame luxury SUV First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026
Facelift History All-new GX 550 launched in South Africa in 2025 with Overtrail and SE grades New South African model line launched in 2026
Facelift Launched Since All-new GX 550 launched in South Africa in 2025 with Overtrail and SE grades New South African model line launched in 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17 Current South African 2026 specification
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Luxury SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2475-2515 kg 1970 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec GX Land Cruiser FJ
Length 5015 mm 4610 mm
Width 2000 mm 1855 mm
Height 1870 mm 1890 mm
Wheelbase 2850 mm 2580 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 220 mm 245 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 63 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1063 l 488 l
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3110 kg 2500 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6 m 5.5 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 125 mm
Kerb Weight - 1970 kg
Payload Capacity - 530 kg
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 994 mm
Rear Headroom - 958 mm
Front Legroom - 1044 mm
Rear Legroom - 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This GX and Land Cruiser FJ comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GX 96 vs Land Cruiser FJ 60.

Efficiency index: GX 34 vs Land Cruiser FJ 38.

Safety-equipment index: GX 93 vs Land Cruiser FJ 94.

Practicality index: GX 88 vs Land Cruiser FJ 74.

Ownership-cover index: GX not separately scored vs Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GX leads by 13 points

GX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser FJ remains close.

Evidence leader 81 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 70% source coverage
81
#1 Evidence leader

GX

70% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 34
Performance 96
Efficiency 34
Safety 93
Practicality 88
Leads by 13 points
68
#2

Land Cruiser FJ

74% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 60
Efficiency 38
Safety 94
Practicality 74
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GX +36 Efficiency Land Cruiser FJ +4 Safety Land Cruiser FJ +1 Practicality GX +14

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GX

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 34/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 88/100

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 74/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus GX leads the specification evidence index with 81 pts vs 68 pts for Land Cruiser FJ

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GX leads. However, Land Cruiser FJ may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

GX vs Land Cruiser FJ questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.