Hyundai Grand i10 Sedan vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai Grand i10 Sedan in South Africa

Hyundai Grand i10 Sedan

1.2 Executive Sedan 4AT Petrol Current
ZAR 309,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW 🔧 114 Nm ⛽ 16.9 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

2.4L 4x2 GL M/T Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 81 kW 🔧 200 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Grand i10 Sedan vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab: the short answer

Grand i10 Sedan and Triton Single Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Grand i10 Sedan starts ZAR 220,090 cheaper Grand i10 Sedan from ZAR 279,900 · Triton Single Cab from ZAR 499,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Grand i10 Sedan Triton Single Cab
Maximum Power Grand i10 Sedan61 kW Triton Single Cab81 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque Grand i10 Sedan114 Nm Triton Single Cab200 Nm @ 1000-3750 rpm
Engine Size Grand i10 Sedan1197 cc Triton Single Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Grand i10 Sedan16.9 km/l Triton Single Cab12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Grand i10 Sedan165 mm Triton Single Cab200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Hyundai Grand i10 Sedan

1.2 Executive Sedan 4AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

2.4L 4x2 GL M/T

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Grand i10 Sedan

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Triton Single Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Grand i10 Sedan

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Triton Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Grand i10 Sedan Triton Single Cab
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2024
Generation Current South African Grand i10 Sedan listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Single-cab pickup
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Sedan One-ton single-cab pickup
Tare Mass Kg 940-1037 kg -
Vehicle Type Sedan Light commercial vehicle
Spec Grand i10 Sedan Triton Single Cab
Length 3995 mm 5320 mm
Width 1680 mm 1865 mm
Height 1520 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase 2450 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 165 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space 402 l 1904 l
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed 1625 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 2570 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 945 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 1 rows
Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 6.35 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1007 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1059 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This Grand i10 Sedan and Triton Single Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Grand i10 Sedan 30 vs Triton Single Cab 34.

Efficiency index: Grand i10 Sedan 66 vs Triton Single Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: Grand i10 Sedan 40 vs Triton Single Cab 32.

Practicality index: Grand i10 Sedan 64 vs Triton Single Cab 72.

Ownership-cover index: Grand i10 Sedan 65 vs Triton Single Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Grand i10 Sedan leads by 5 points

Grand i10 Sedan and Triton Single Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 51 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 76% source coverage
51
#1 Evidence leader

Grand i10 Sedan

76% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 66 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 66
Safety 40
Practicality 64
Ownership 65
Leads by 5 points
46
#2

Triton Single Cab

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 72 Check Safety 32
Performance 34
Efficiency 49
Safety 32
Practicality 72
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Triton Single Cab +4 Efficiency Grand i10 Sedan +17 Safety Grand i10 Sedan +8 Practicality Triton Single Cab +8

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Grand i10 Sedan

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 66/100
Safety 40/100
Practicality 64/100
Ownership 65/100

Triton Single Cab

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 72/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Grand i10 Sedan leads the specification evidence index with 51 pts vs 46 pts for Triton Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Grand i10 Sedan leads. However, Triton Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Grand i10 Sedan vs Triton Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.