Toyota GR86 vs Isuzu MU-X

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR86 in South Africa

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 173 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 10.9 km/l
VS
Isuzu MU-X in South Africa

Isuzu MU-X

3.0 DDi LSE 4x4 AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 973,800 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR86 vs Isuzu MU-X: the short answer

MU-X holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over GR86.

GR86 starts ZAR 2,500 cheaper GR86 from ZAR 749,900 · MU-X from ZAR 752,400

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR86 MU-X
Maximum Power GR86173 kW @ 7000 rpm MU-X110 kW @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque GR86250 Nm @ 3700 rpm MU-X350 Nm
Engine Size GR862387 cc MU-X3000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR8610.9 km/l MU-X13.2 km/l
Ground Clearance GR86130 mm MU-X235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Isuzu MU-X

3.0 DDi LSE 4x4 AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

GR86

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

MU-X

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR86

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

MU-X

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR86 MU-X
360 Degree Camera Not Available Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control Not Available Not Available
Adaptive Cruise Control Not Available Not Available
Around View Monitor Not Available Standard
Autonomous Emergency Braking Not Available Standard
Auto Lights Standard Standard
Auto Wipers Standard Not Available
Blind Spot Monitoring Not Available Standard
Blind Spot Warning Not Available Standard
Cruise Control Standard Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert Not Available Not Available
Emergency Braking Not Available Standard
EV Mode Not Available Not Available
Lane Departure Warning Not Available Standard
Lane Keep Assist Not Available Standard
Parking Distance Sensors Rear Front & Rear
Parking Sensor Rear Front & Rear
Parking Sensors Rear Front & Rear
Pre-Collision System Not Available Standard
Rain Sensor Wipers Standard -
Rear View Camera Standard Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Not Available Standard
Rear View Camera Standard Standard
Reverse Camera Standard Standard
Reverse Camera Type Standard Standard
Reversing Camera Standard Standard
Surround View Camera Not Available Standard
Traffic Sign Recognition Not Available Not Available
Rear Parking Sensors Rear Front & Rear
Auto Highbeam Not Available Standard
Park Assist Not Available Not Available
Forward Collision Warning Not Available Standard
Automatic High Beam - Standard
Driver Monitoring - Standard
Front Camera - Standard
Multi Collision Braking - Standard
Occupant Detection Sensor - Passengers
Spec GR86 MU-X
4WD Engagement Not Applicable Available
4WD Hi Range Not Applicable Available
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Available where 4WD low range is fitted
4WD Selector Not Applicable Standard
Automatic Shift Paddles Standard Standard
Axle Layout RWD 4WD / AWD
Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Differential Type Front Not Available -
Differential Type Rear Not Available -
Drivetrain RWD 4WD / AWD
Drivetrain Layout Rear Wheel Drive 4WD / AWD
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Number of Gears 4 4
Gear Shift Type 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters Automatic
Gearbox 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters Automatic
Gearbox Type 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters Automatic
LSD Available Torsen LSD Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Available where 4WD low range is fitted
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters Standard Standard
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Standard
Transfer Case Not Applicable Confirmed 4WD derivative
Transfer Case Guard Not Available Standard
Transmission Speeds 4 4
Transmission Type Automatic 6 Speed Automatic
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Clutch Type Not Applicable Not Applicable
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable Not Applicable
Drive Mode Selector - 4WD/off-road drive mode support
Gear Knob Trim - Leather / Piano Black
Gear Ratio 1st - 3.600
Gear Ratio 2nd - 2.090
Gear Ratio 3rd - 1.488
Gear Ratio 4th - 1.000
Gear Ratio 5th - 0.687
Gear Ratio 6th - 0.580
Gear Ratio Reverse - 3.732

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR86 and MU-X comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR86 67 vs MU-X 63.

Efficiency index: GR86 45 vs MU-X 52.

Safety-equipment index: GR86 96 vs MU-X 93.

Practicality index: GR86 46 vs MU-X 93.

Ownership-cover index: GR86 43 vs MU-X not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

MU-X leads by 15 points

MU-X holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over GR86.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 72% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

MU-X

72% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 63
Efficiency 52
Safety 93
Practicality 93
Leads by 15 points
61
#2

GR86

87% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Ownership 43
Performance 67
Efficiency 45
Safety 96
Practicality 46
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR86 +4 Efficiency MU-X +7 Safety GR86 +3 Practicality MU-X +47

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

MU-X

Performance 63/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 93/100

GR86

Performance 67/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 46/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Isuzu MU-X leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 61 pts for GR86

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, MU-X leads. However, GR86 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

GR86 vs MU-X questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.