Toyota GR Yaris vs GWM P500

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR Yaris in South Africa

Toyota GR Yaris

1.6T GR-Four Rally 6MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 897,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 200 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.5 km/l
VS
GWM P500 in South Africa

GWM P500

2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT Hybrid 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 255 kW 🔧 648 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR Yaris vs GWM P500: the short answer

P500 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GR Yaris remains close.

P500 starts ZAR 97,500 cheaper GR Yaris from ZAR 897,400 · P500 from ZAR 799,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR Yaris P500
Maximum Power GR Yaris200 kW P500255 kW
Maximum Torque GR Yaris370 Nm P500648 Nm
Engine Size GR Yaris1618 cc P5002000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR Yaris11.5 km/l P50010.2 km/l
Ground Clearance GR Yaris180 mm P500224 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR Yaris

1.6T GR-Four Rally 6MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

GWM P500

2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

GR Yaris

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

P500

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR Yaris

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

P500

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR Yaris P500
Model Introduced Year 2021 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation First generation GR Yaris – purpose-built WRC homologation road car Current South African P500 listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History High-performance 8AT added to the range in 2023 Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Double-cab pickup
Color Note Circuit Yellow, White Pearl, Black Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment Hatchback Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 1280 kg 2761 kg
Vehicle Type Hatchback Pickup
Body Type Cab - Pickup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT
Spec GR Yaris P500
Length 3995 mm 5445 mm
Width 1805 mm 1991 mm
Height 1455 mm 1924 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 3350 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 174 l 450 l
Kerb Weight 1280 kg 2810 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1620 kg 3495 kg
Payload Capacity 340 kg 685 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 6.0 m
Front Headroom 981 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 957 mm 960 mm
Front Legroom 1038 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 885 mm 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR Yaris and P500 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR Yaris 85 vs P500 98.

Efficiency index: GR Yaris 45 vs P500 50.

Safety-equipment index: GR Yaris 90 vs P500 88.

Practicality index: GR Yaris 46 vs P500 78.

Ownership-cover index: GR Yaris 43 vs P500 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

P500 leads by 14 points

P500 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GR Yaris remains close.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 14 points
Data 73% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

P500

73% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Efficiency 50
Performance 98
Efficiency 50
Safety 88
Practicality 78
Ownership 65
Leads by 14 points
64
#2

GR Yaris

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Ownership 43
Performance 85
Efficiency 45
Safety 90
Practicality 46
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance P500 +13 Efficiency P500 +5 Safety GR Yaris +2 Practicality P500 +32 Ownership P500 +22

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

P500

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 65/100

GR Yaris

Performance 85/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 46/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM P500 leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 64 pts for GR Yaris

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, P500 leads. However, GR Yaris may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Ranger Wildtrak
Ranger Wildtrak
GR Yaris vs Ranger Wildtrak →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
GR Corolla
GR Corolla
GR Yaris vs GR Corolla →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
GR Yaris vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
GR Yaris vs Hunter K50 REEV →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Golf GTI
Golf GTI
GR Yaris vs Golf GTI →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Terron 9
Terron 9
GR Yaris vs Terron 9 →
P500
P500
VS
Ranger Wildtrak
Ranger Wildtrak
P500 vs Ranger Wildtrak →
P500
P500
VS
GR Corolla
GR Corolla
P500 vs GR Corolla →

GR Yaris vs P500 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.