Toyota GR Supra vs Mahindra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van in South Africa

Mahindra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

XUV 3XO 1.2 MX1 MT Panel Van Petrol Current
ZAR 296,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 81 kW 🔧 200 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR Supra vs Mahindra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van: the short answer

GR Supra has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van.

XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van starts ZAR 1,227,801 cheaper GR Supra from ZAR 1,524,800 · XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van from ZAR 296,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR Supra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van
Maximum Power GR Supra285 kW XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van81 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque GR Supra500 Nm XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van200 Nm
Engine Size GR Supra2998 cc XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van1197 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR Supra12 km/l XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van15.2 km/l
Ground Clearance GR Supra117 mm XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van201 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mahindra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

XUV 3XO 1.2 MX1 MT Panel Van

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

GR Supra

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR Supra

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR Supra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van
Model Introduced Year 2021 Not Available
Generation A90 fifth generation – co-developed with BMW on the CLAR platform Current local listing
Facelift History Manual gearbox and power upgrade (280 kW→285 kW) in 2023 Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Van
Color Note Matte White, Nitro Yellow, Renaissance Red, Gravure Grey, Tungsten Silver, Black -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active Active
Segment Sedan Van
Tare Mass Kg 1545 kg 1362 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan Van
Spec GR Supra XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van
Length 4380 mm -
Width 1865 mm -
Height 1294 mm -
Wheelbase 2470 mm -
Ground Clearance (Default) 117 mm 201 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l -
Boot/Cargo Space 290 l -
Kerb Weight 1545 kg 1362 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1870 kg -
Payload Capacity 325 kg -
Towing Capacity 1600 kg -
Seating Capacity 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows -
Doors 4 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 6.3 m -
Front Headroom 995 mm -
Rear Headroom Not Applicable -
Front Legroom 1040 mm -
Rear Legroom Not Applicable -

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR Supra and XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR Supra 94 vs XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van 35.

Efficiency index: GR Supra 47 vs XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van 60.

Safety-equipment index: GR Supra 98 vs XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van 27.

Practicality index: GR Supra 40 vs XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van 50.

Ownership-cover index: GR Supra 43 vs XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GR Supra leads by 25 points

GR Supra has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 25 points
Data 90% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

GR Supra

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 40
Performance 94
Efficiency 47
Safety 98
Practicality 40
Ownership 43
Leads by 25 points
42
#2

XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

51% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 60 Check Safety 27
Performance 35
Efficiency 60
Safety 27
Practicality 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR Supra +59 Efficiency XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van +13 Safety GR Supra +71 Practicality XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van +10

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GR Supra

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 40/100
Ownership 43/100

XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 27/100
Practicality 50/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota GR Supra leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 42 pts for XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GR Supra leads. However, XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
3 Series
3 Series
GR Supra vs 3 Series →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
Quantum Bus
Quantum Bus
GR Supra vs Quantum Bus →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
C-Class
C-Class
GR Supra vs C-Class →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
CLA Hybrid
CLA HybridUpcoming
GR Supra vs CLA Hybrid →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
Crafter
Crafter
GR Supra vs Crafter →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
ES
ES
GR Supra vs ES →
XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van
XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van
VS
3 Series
3 Series
XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van vs 3 Series →
XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van
XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van
VS
Quantum Bus
Quantum Bus
XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van vs Quantum Bus →

GR Supra vs XUV 3XO Xprez Panel Van questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.