Toyota GR Supra vs GWM Tank 500

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12 km/l
VS
GWM Tank 500 in South Africa

GWM Tank 500

3.0T Hi4-T Luxury Plug-in Hybrid 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 340 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 40 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR Supra vs GWM Tank 500: the short answer

Tank 500 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over GR Supra.

Tank 500 starts ZAR 374,900 cheaper GR Supra from ZAR 1,524,800 · Tank 500 from ZAR 1,149,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR Supra Tank 500
Maximum Power GR Supra285 kW Tank 500340 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque GR Supra500 Nm Tank 500750 Nm
Engine Size GR Supra2998 cc Tank 5002999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR Supra12 km/l Tank 50040 km/l
Ground Clearance GR Supra117 mm Tank 500224 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

GWM Tank 500

3.0T Hi4-T Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

GR Supra

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Tank 500

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR Supra

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Tank 500

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR Supra Tank 500
Model Introduced Year 2021 2025
Generation A90 fifth generation – co-developed with BMW on the CLAR platform First generation Tank 500, launched globally in 2023 and brought to South Africa in 2025. Local specification leans toward maximum equipment loading and softer suspension calibration versus the Chinese-domestic version.
Facelift History Manual gearbox and power upgrade (280 kW→285 kW) in 2023 Recently launched into the SA market in 2025; no facelift to date. Software updates expected to refine hybrid system behaviour and adaptive air suspension calibration based on early SA fleet feedback.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Color Note Matte White, Nitro Yellow, Renaissance Red, Gravure Grey, Tungsten Silver, Black Crystal White, Hamilton Black, Pittsburgh Silver, Cosmos Grey, Atlantic Blue and Adventure Olive Green. Two-tone roof options available with selected base colours.
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment Sedan SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1545 kg 2680 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Spec GR Supra Tank 500
Length 4380 mm 5060 mm
Width 1865 mm 1996 mm
Height 1294 mm 1905 mm
Wheelbase 2470 mm 2950 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 117 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 204 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 290 l 580 l
Kerb Weight 1545 kg 2680 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1870 kg 3200 kg
Payload Capacity 325 kg 855 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 3000 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.3 m 13 m
Front Headroom 995 mm 990 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable 960 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable 890 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR Supra and Tank 500 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR Supra 94 vs Tank 500 100.

Efficiency index: GR Supra 47 vs Tank 500 97.

Safety-equipment index: GR Supra 98 vs Tank 500 100.

Practicality index: GR Supra 40 vs Tank 500 83.

Ownership-cover index: GR Supra 43 vs Tank 500 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tank 500 leads by 23 points

Tank 500 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over GR Supra.

Evidence leader 90 /100
Lead 23 points
Data 99% source coverage
90
#1 Evidence leader

Tank 500

99% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 100
Efficiency 97
Safety 100
Practicality 83
Ownership 65
Leads by 23 points
67
#2

GR Supra

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 40
Performance 94
Efficiency 47
Safety 98
Practicality 40
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 500 +6 Efficiency Tank 500 +50 Safety Tank 500 +2 Practicality Tank 500 +43 Ownership Tank 500 +22

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tank 500

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 83/100
Ownership 65/100

GR Supra

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 40/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM Tank 500 leads the specification evidence index with 90 pts vs 67 pts for GR Supra

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tank 500 leads. However, GR Supra may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
Mustang
Mustang
GR Supra vs Mustang →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
E-Class
E-Class
GR Supra vs E-Class →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
iX2
iX2
GR Supra vs iX2 →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
5 Series
5 Series
GR Supra vs 5 Series →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
Santa Fe Hybrid
Santa Fe Hybrid
GR Supra vs Santa Fe Hybrid →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
GLC Coupé
GLC Coupé
GR Supra vs GLC Coupé →
Tank 500
Tank 500
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Tank 500 vs Mustang →
Tank 500
Tank 500
VS
E-Class
E-Class
Tank 500 vs E-Class →

GR Supra vs Tank 500 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.