Toyota GR Supra vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW 🔧 700 Nm ⛽ 9.4 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR Supra vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300: the short answer

Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GR Supra remains close.

GR Supra starts ZAR 325,100 cheaper GR Supra from ZAR 1,524,800 · Land Cruiser 300 from ZAR 1,849,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR Supra Land Cruiser 300
Maximum Power GR Supra285 kW Land Cruiser 300227 kW
Maximum Torque GR Supra500 Nm Land Cruiser 300700 Nm
Engine Size GR Supra2998 cc Land Cruiser 3003346 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR Supra12 km/l Land Cruiser 3009.4 km/l
Ground Clearance GR Supra117 mm Land Cruiser 300235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

GR Supra

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR Supra

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Land Cruiser 300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR Supra Land Cruiser 300
Model Introduced Year 2021 2021
Generation A90 fifth generation – co-developed with BMW on the CLAR platform 300-series Land Cruiser on latest LGAA platform
Facelift History Manual gearbox and power upgrade (280 kW→285 kW) in 2023 New generation introduced in 2021 with complete redesign
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Color Note Matte White, Nitro Yellow, Renaissance Red, Gravure Grey, Tungsten Silver, Black White, Black, Silver, Grey, Dark Blue, Bronze
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Sedan SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1545 kg 2430 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic
Spec GR Supra Land Cruiser 300
Length 4380 mm 4985 mm
Width 1865 mm 1980 mm
Height 1294 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase 2470 mm 2850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 117 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 110 l
Boot/Cargo Space 290 l 309 l
Kerb Weight 1545 kg 2430 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1870 kg 3300 kg
Payload Capacity 325 kg 870 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 3 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.3 m 6 m
Front Headroom 995 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable 957 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1105 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR Supra and Land Cruiser 300 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR Supra 94 vs Land Cruiser 300 95.

Efficiency index: GR Supra 47 vs Land Cruiser 300 40.

Safety-equipment index: GR Supra 98 vs Land Cruiser 300 99.

Practicality index: GR Supra 40 vs Land Cruiser 300 82.

Ownership-cover index: GR Supra 43 vs Land Cruiser 300 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Land Cruiser 300 leads by 9 points

Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GR Supra remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 92% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

92% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 95
Efficiency 40
Safety 99
Practicality 82
Ownership 43
Leads by 9 points
67
#2

GR Supra

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 40
Performance 94
Efficiency 47
Safety 98
Practicality 40
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 300 +1 Efficiency GR Supra +7 Safety Land Cruiser 300 +1 Practicality Land Cruiser 300 +42 Ownership Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 95/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 82/100
Ownership 43/100

GR Supra

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 40/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Land Cruiser 300 leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 67 pts for GR Supra

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, GR Supra may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
RZ
RZ
GR Supra vs RZ →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
X5
X5
GR Supra vs X5 →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
i5
i5
GR Supra vs i5 →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
GLE
GLE
GR Supra vs GLE →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
GX
GX
GR Supra vs GX →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
RX
RX
GR Supra vs RX →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
RZ
RZ
Land Cruiser 300 vs RZ →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
X5
X5
Land Cruiser 300 vs X5 →

GR Supra vs Land Cruiser 300 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.