Rolls-Royce Ghost vs Ford Mustang

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Rolls-Royce Ghost in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Ghost

Ghost Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 6.37 km/l
VS
Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0L V8 Dark Horse 10AT Petrol Current
ZAR 1,545,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 334 kW 🔧 540 Nm ⛽ 12.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Rolls-Royce Ghost vs Ford Mustang: the short answer

Ghost and Mustang are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Ghost Mustang
Maximum Power Ghost420 kW @ 5000 rpm Mustang334 kW @ 6500 rpm
Maximum Torque Ghost850 Nm @ 1600 rpm Mustang540 Nm @ 5100 rpm
Engine Size Ghost6749 cc Mustang5038 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Ghost6.37 km/l Mustang12.8 km/l
Ground Clearance Ghost118 mm Mustang143 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Ghost

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Mustang

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Ghost

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Mustang

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Ghost Mustang
Model Introduced Year 2020 2016
Generation Second-generation Ghost in standard-wheelbase Series II form Seventh generation Mustang with S650 platform
Facelift History The second-generation Ghost was introduced in South Africa in 2020 and evolved into Ghost Series II in October 2024 Latest generation introduced with improved tech and design
Facelift Launched Since 2024 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Four-door luxury saloon Fastback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment Full-size super-luxury saloon Sedan
Vehicle Type Internal-combustion passenger car Sedan
Color Note - White, Black, Red, Blue, Yellow, Grey, Orange
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Tare Mass Kg - 1660 kg
Spec Ghost Mustang
Length 5545 mm 4811 mm
Width 1998 mm 1915 mm
Height 1573 mm 1408 mm
Wheelbase 3295 mm 2719 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 118 mm 143 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 118 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 l 61 l
Boot/Cargo Space 500 l 408 l
Kerb Weight 2490 kg 1660 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3130 kg 2245 kg
Payload Capacity 640 kg -
Towing Capacity 0 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.5 m 6.1 m
Front Headroom 1030 mm -
Rear Headroom 990 mm -
Front Legroom 1060 mm -
Rear Legroom 1075 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Ghost and Mustang comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Ghost 100 vs Mustang 96.

Efficiency index: Ghost 30 vs Mustang 48.

Safety-equipment index: Ghost 99 vs Mustang 96.

Practicality index: Ghost 64 vs Mustang 57.

Ownership-cover index: Ghost not separately scored vs Mustang not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Ghost leads by 0 points

Ghost and Mustang are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 79% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Ghost

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Efficiency 30
Performance 100
Efficiency 30
Safety 99
Practicality 64
Leads by 0 points
76
#2

Mustang

71% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 48
Performance 96
Efficiency 48
Safety 96
Practicality 57
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ghost +4 Efficiency Mustang +18 Safety Ghost +3 Practicality Ghost +7

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Ghost

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 30/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 64/100

Mustang

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 48/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 57/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Ghost leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 76 pts for Mustang

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ghost leads. However, Mustang may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Ghost vs Mustang questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.