Lexus ES vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Lexus ES in South Africa

Lexus ES

ES 300h SE Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 1,138,800 ex-showroom
⚡ 160 kW 🔧 221 Nm ⛽ 21.7 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

4.0 V6 Single Cab MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 780,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Lexus ES vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab: the short answer

ES has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab remains close.

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab starts ZAR 145,300 cheaper ES from ZAR 851,500 · Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab from ZAR 706,200

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification ES Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Maximum Power ES160 kW @ 5700 rpm Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab202 kW
Maximum Torque ES221 Nm Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab381 Nm
Engine Size ES2500 cc Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab3956 cc
Combined Fuel Economy ES21.7 km/l Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab13 km/l
Ground Clearance ES158 mm Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Lexus ES

ES 300h SE

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

4.0 V6 Single Cab MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

ES

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

ES

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec ES Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Model Introduced Year 2021 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Current seventh-generation Lexus ES executive sedan Current South African Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Current South African ES range; the next-generation local range has not yet received final derivative confirmation Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Current South African ES range; the next-generation local range has not yet received final derivative confirmation Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17 Current
Body Style Sedan Pickup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Executive sedan Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 1740 kg 1850 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan Pickup
Body Type Cab - Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec ES Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Length 4975 mm 5275 mm
Width 1865 mm 1855 mm
Height 1445 mm 1855 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 3085 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 158 mm 235 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 87 l
Boot/Cargo Space 454 l 488 l
Kerb Weight 1740 kg 1850 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2150 kg 2800 kg
Payload Capacity 410 kg 950 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 3 seats
Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m 6.4 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 125 mm
Towing Capacity - 3500 kg
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 997 mm
Rear Headroom - 944 mm
Front Legroom - 1037 mm
Rear Legroom - 884 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This ES and Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: ES 58 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 78.

Efficiency index: ES 85 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: ES 93 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 50.

Practicality index: ES 62 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 78.

Ownership-cover index: ES not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

ES leads by 11 points

ES has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 68% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

ES

68% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Performance 58
Performance 58
Efficiency 85
Safety 93
Practicality 62
Leads by 11 points
62
#2

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

86% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 78 Check Ownership 43
Performance 78
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 78
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab +20 Efficiency ES +36 Safety ES +43 Practicality Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab +16

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

ES

Performance 58/100
Efficiency 85/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 62/100

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

Performance 78/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus ES leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 62 pts for Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, ES leads. However, Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

ES
ES
VS
Terron 9
Terron 9
ES vs Terron 9 →
ES
ES
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
ES vs Hunter K50 REEV →
ES
ES
VS
P500
P500
ES vs P500 →
ES
ES
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
ES vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab →
ES
ES
VS
A-Class
A-Class
ES vs A-Class →
ES
ES
VS
GR86
GR86
ES vs GR86 →
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
VS
Terron 9
Terron 9
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab vs Terron 9 →
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab vs Hunter K50 REEV →

ES vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.