Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Toyota Fortuner

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mercedes-Benz EQA in South Africa

Mercedes-Benz EQA

Current
Price on request
VS
Toyota Fortuner in South Africa

Toyota Fortuner

2.8 GD-6 4X4 GR-Sport 6AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 999,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Toyota Fortuner: the short answer

Compare the available model information below. Hagalu has withheld a ranked verdict because the selected vehicles do not yet meet the minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification EQA Fortuner
Maximum Power EQA- Fortuner150 kW
Maximum Torque EQA- Fortuner500 Nm
Engine Size EQA- Fortuner2755 cc
Combined Fuel Economy EQA- Fortuner13.2 km/l
Ground Clearance EQA- Fortuner279 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Mercedes-Benz EQA

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec EQA Fortuner
Model Introduced Year - 2006
Generation - Currently sold Fortuner belongs to the second generation with periodic feature and safety upgrades
Facelift History - Major updates in 2016 (new generation) and feature refreshes in 2021 with improved infotainment, safety tech, and design tweaks
Facelift Launched Since - 2021
Facelift Version Ending - Current
Body Style - SUV
Color Note - White, Black, Silver, Dark Green, Grey
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.8 GD-6 4X4 GR-Sport 6AT
Model Year - Current
Production Status - active
Segment - SUV
Tare Mass Kg - GVM 2735 kg; Toyota SA does not publish tare mass
Vehicle Type - SUV
Spec EQA Fortuner
Length - 4795 mm
Width - 1855 mm
Height - 1835 mm
Wheelbase - 2745 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) - 279 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity - 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space - 541 l
Kerb Weight - 1946 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) - 2735 kg
Payload Capacity - 493 kg
Towing Capacity - 2800 kg
Seating Capacity - 7 seats
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Doors - 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius - 5.8 m
Front Headroom - 1015 mm
Rear Headroom - 979 mm
Front Legroom - 1048 mm
Rear Legroom - 928 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This EQA and Fortuner comparison brings together local model information and available derivatives for South Africa. Prices and specifications appear only where they have been recorded for this market.

Hagalu has withheld an overall score because at least one selected vehicle does not yet have four comparable categories and 50% weighted source coverage. Missing catalogue evidence is not replaced with a neutral score or a guessed value.

Use the key-spec and full-spec tables to compare the fields that are confirmed. For a purchase decision, verify current availability, exact derivative equipment, finance, insurance and ownership cover with the relevant manufacturer or authorised retailer.

Specification Score Withheld

Hagalu does not turn missing specifications into neutral scores or guessed values.

Fail closed

Score withheld: fewer than four comparable categories or less than 50% weighted source coverage for at least one vehicle.

Use the verified key-spec and full-spec tables on this page. A ranked index will appear only after every selected vehicle has source-backed data in at least four categories and reaches 50% weighted coverage.

What the evidence means

No overall winner is declared because the selected vehicles do not yet meet Hagalu's minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold. Compare the confirmed rows and verify the exact derivative before buying.

EQA vs Fortuner questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.