Hyundai Elantra vs Lexus UX

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Elantra Discontinued model
Hyundai Elantra in South Africa

Hyundai Elantra

1.5 IVT Fluid Petrol Discontinued model
ZAR 492,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 143 Nm ⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Lexus UX in South Africa

Lexus UX

UX 300h EX Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 957,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 146 kW 🔧 188 Nm ⛽ 23.8 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Elantra vs Lexus UX: the short answer

UX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Elantra remains close.

Recorded price context Elantra: last listed from ZAR 448,900 · UX: current from ZAR 957,100

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Elantra UX
Maximum Power Elantra85 kW @ 6300 rpm UX146 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Elantra143 Nm @ 4500 rpm UX188 Nm
Engine Size Elantra1497 cc UX2000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Elantra17.5 km/l UX23.8 km/l
Ground Clearance Elantra130 mm UX160 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Hyundai Elantra

1.5 IVT Fluid

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Lexus UX

UX 300h EX

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Elantra

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

UX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Elantra

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

UX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Elantra UX
Model Introduced Year 1990 2019
Generation Seventh generation Elantra on Hyundai's K3 platform; bold parametric design language marks a clear break from the conservative sixth gen Current Lexus UX compact luxury crossover with the 300h hybrid powertrain
Facelift History Seventh generation launched globally in 2020 and brought to SA; significant leap in styling and interior quality over the previous generation Updated local UX range centred on the UX 300h EX hybrid
Facelift Launched Since 2020 Updated local UX range centred on the UX 300h EX hybrid
Body Style Sedan SUV
Production Status discontinued published
Segment Sedan Luxury SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1355 kg 1585 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Spec Elantra UX
Length 4680 mm 4495 mm
Width 1825 mm 1840 mm
Height 1415 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase 2720 mm 2640 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 130 mm 160 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed -
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 l 43 l
Boot/Cargo Space 473 l 268 l
Kerb Weight 1355 kg 1585 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1860 kg 2110 kg
Payload Capacity 505 kg 525 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.2 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Elantra and UX comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Elantra 36 vs UX 55.

Efficiency index: Elantra 67 vs UX 92.

Safety-equipment index: Elantra 84 vs UX 93.

Practicality index: Elantra 61 vs UX 55.

Ownership-cover index: Elantra 65 vs UX not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

UX leads by 10 points

UX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Elantra remains close.

Evidence leader 72 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 67% source coverage
72
#1 Evidence leader

UX

67% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Performance 55
Performance 55
Efficiency 92
Safety 93
Practicality 55
Leads by 10 points
62
#2

Elantra

93% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 67
Safety 84
Practicality 61
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance UX +19 Efficiency UX +25 Safety UX +9 Practicality Elantra +6

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

UX

Performance 55/100
Efficiency 92/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 55/100

Elantra

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus UX leads the specification evidence index with 72 pts vs 62 pts for Elantra

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, UX leads. However, Elantra may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
E5 Electric
E5 Electric
Elantra vs E5 Electric →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
Elantra vs ATTO 3 →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
007
007
Elantra vs 007 →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
H6 GT
H6 GT
Elantra vs H6 GT →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
Tank 300
Tank 300
Elantra vs Tank 300 →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
H6 PHEV
H6 PHEV
Elantra vs H6 PHEV →
UX
UX
VS
E5 Electric
E5 Electric
UX vs E5 Electric →
UX
UX
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
UX vs ATTO 3 →

Elantra vs UX questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.