Hyundai Elantra vs Ford Everest

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Elantra Discontinued model
Hyundai Elantra in South Africa

Hyundai Elantra

1.5 IVT Fluid Petrol Discontinued model
ZAR 492,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 143 Nm ⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,340,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Elantra vs Ford Everest: the short answer

Everest holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Elantra.

Recorded price context Elantra: last listed from ZAR 448,900 · Everest: current from ZAR 825,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Elantra Everest
Maximum Power Elantra85 kW @ 6300 rpm Everest184 kW @ 3250 rpm
Maximum Torque Elantra143 Nm @ 4500 rpm Everest600 Nm
Engine Size Elantra1497 cc Everest2993 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Elantra17.5 km/l Everest11.8 km/l
Ground Clearance Elantra130 mm Everest226 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Hyundai Elantra

1.5 IVT Fluid

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Elantra

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Elantra

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Everest

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Elantra Everest
Model Introduced Year 1990 2022
Generation Seventh generation Elantra on Hyundai's K3 platform; bold parametric design language marks a clear break from the conservative sixth gen Current-generation Ford Everest
Facelift History Seventh generation launched globally in 2020 and brought to SA; significant leap in styling and interior quality over the previous generation Major generational update in 2022 with improved safety, technology, and design
Facelift Launched Since 2020 2022
Body Style Sedan SUV
Production Status discontinued active
Segment Sedan SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1355 kg 2450 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Color Note Not confirmed White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Spec Elantra Everest
Length 4680 mm 4914 mm
Width 1825 mm 1923 mm
Height 1415 mm 1842 mm
Wheelbase 2720 mm 2900 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 130 mm 226 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 473 l 259 l
Kerb Weight 1355 kg 2450 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1860 kg 3150 kg
Payload Capacity 505 kg 680 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.9 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 972 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 953 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1058 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 912 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Elantra and Everest comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Elantra 36 vs Everest 88.

Efficiency index: Elantra 67 vs Everest 52.

Safety-equipment index: Elantra 84 vs Everest 92.

Practicality index: Elantra 61 vs Everest 77.

Ownership-cover index: Elantra 65 vs Everest not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Everest leads by 17 points

Everest holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Elantra.

Evidence leader 79 /100
Lead 17 points
Data 80% source coverage
79
#1 Evidence leader

Everest

80% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 88
Efficiency 52
Safety 92
Practicality 77
Leads by 17 points
62
#2

Elantra

93% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 67
Safety 84
Practicality 61
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +52 Efficiency Elantra +15 Safety Everest +8 Practicality Everest +16

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Everest

Performance 88/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 77/100

Elantra

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Everest leads the specification evidence index with 79 pts vs 62 pts for Elantra

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Everest leads. However, Elantra may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
03T
03T
Elantra vs 03T →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
Elantra vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
Elantra vs T-Roc →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
H7
H7
Elantra vs H7 →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
Sportage
Sportage
Elantra vs Sportage →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Elantra vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
Everest
Everest
VS
03T
03T
Everest vs 03T →
Everest
Everest
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
Everest vs SEALION 6 DM-i →

Elantra vs Everest questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.