Hyundai Elantra vs Ford Everest

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Hyundai Elantra in South Africa

Hyundai Elantra

1.5 IVT Fluid Petrol automatic
492,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 85 kW (114 hp)
🔧 143 Nm
⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Everest
Mileage Everest
🔑 Ownership Elantra

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+12
pts
#2

Elantra

56
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Everest has a slight advantage, but Elantra remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +6 pts
Efficiency Everest +7 pts
Safety Everest +2 pts
Practicality Everest +1 pts
Ownership Elantra +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Elantra

Performance 7/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

Elantra

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Elantra

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Elantra Everest
Length 4680 4914
Width 1825 1923
Height 1415 1842
Wheelbase 2720 2900
Ground Clearance 130 220
Kerb Weight 1355 2305
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 473 259
Gross Vehicle Weight - 3100
Towing Capacity - 3500
Specification Elantra Everest
Engine 1.5 MPI CVVD 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel
Engine Type Petrol Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 1497 1996
Cylinders 4 4
Power 85 125
Torque 143 405
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger No -
Top Speed 180 180
0-100 km/h 11.2 11.5
Power @ RPM @ 6300 rpm -
Torque @ RPM @ 4500 rpm -
Valves per Cylinder - 4

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 56 pts for Elantra

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Elantra may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Elantra scores 0 while Everest scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Elantra scores 18 and Everest scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Elantra scores 20 versus Everest scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Elantra 11 and Everest 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Elantra scoring 7 compared to Everest scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Elantra and Everest in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Elantra scores 7 vs 13.

Efficiency: Elantra scores 0 vs 7.

Safety: Elantra scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Elantra scores 11 vs 12.

Ownership: Elantra scores 20 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.