Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Ford Everest

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross in South Africa

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

1.5L GLS Exceed CVT 4x2 Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 620,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
VS
Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,340,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Ford Everest: the short answer

Everest holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eclipse Cross.

Eclipse Cross starts ZAR 290,010 cheaper Eclipse Cross from ZAR 534,990 · Everest from ZAR 825,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Eclipse Cross Everest
Maximum Power Eclipse Cross110 kW @ 5500 rpm Everest184 kW @ 3250 rpm
Maximum Torque Eclipse Cross250 Nm @ 3500 rpm Everest600 Nm
Engine Size Eclipse Cross1499 cc Everest2993 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Eclipse Cross13 km/l Everest11.8 km/l
Ground Clearance Eclipse Cross180 mm Everest226 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Eclipse Cross

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Eclipse Cross

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Everest

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Eclipse Cross Everest
Model Introduced Year 2021 2015
Generation First-generation Eclipse Cross facelift Currently sold Everest belongs to the latest generation with enhanced comfort and safety systems
Facelift History Current South African facelift specification. Major generational update in 2022 with improved safety, technology, and design
Facelift Launched Since Current specification 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Compact crossover SUV Large SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Color Note - White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD
Tare Mass Kg - 2450 kg
Spec Eclipse Cross Everest
Length 4545 mm 4914 mm
Width 1805 mm 1923 mm
Height 1685 mm 1842 mm
Wheelbase 2670 mm 2900 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 226 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 155 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 437 l 259 l
Kerb Weight 1490 kg 2450 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2100 kg 3150 kg
Payload Capacity 610 kg 680 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.3 m 5.9 m
Front Headroom 1003 mm 972 mm
Rear Headroom 932 mm 953 mm
Front Legroom 1039 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 943 mm 912 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Eclipse Cross and Everest comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Eclipse Cross 52 vs Everest 88.

Efficiency index: Eclipse Cross 51 vs Everest 52.

Safety-equipment index: Eclipse Cross 76 vs Everest 81.

Practicality index: Eclipse Cross 64 vs Everest 77.

Ownership-cover index: Eclipse Cross not separately scored vs Everest not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Everest leads by 15 points

Everest holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eclipse Cross.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 71% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Everest

71% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 88 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 88
Efficiency 52
Safety 81
Practicality 77
Leads by 15 points
61
#2

Eclipse Cross

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 52
Efficiency 51
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +36 Efficiency Everest +1 Safety Everest +5 Practicality Everest +13

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Everest

Performance 88/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 81/100
Practicality 77/100

Eclipse Cross

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Everest leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 61 pts for Eclipse Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Everest leads. However, Eclipse Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Eclipse Cross vs Everest questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.