Geely E5 EM-i vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace Discontinued model
Geely E5 EM-i in South Africa

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 679,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 73 kW 🔧 125 Nm
VS
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace in South Africa

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

2.0 TSI 162kW R-Line 4Motion DSG Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 934,700 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 162 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Geely E5 EM-i vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace: the short answer

E5 EM-i and Tiguan Allspace are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context E5 EM-i: current from ZAR 599,999 · Tiguan Allspace: last listed from ZAR 701,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification E5 EM-i Tiguan Allspace
Maximum Power E5 EM-i73 kW Tiguan Allspace162 kW
Maximum Torque E5 EM-i125 Nm Tiguan Allspace350 Nm
Engine Size E5 EM-i1499 cc Tiguan Allspace1984 cc
Combined Fuel Economy E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed Tiguan Allspace12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance E5 EM-i172 mm Tiguan Allspace198 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 2.0 TSI 162kW R-Line 4Motion DSG

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

E5 EM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Tiguan Allspace

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

E5 EM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiguan Allspace

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec E5 EM-i Tiguan Allspace
Model Introduced Year 2025 2017
Generation Current South African model / exact generation number not separately published Second generation Tiguan Allspace (AD/AN) on MQB platform
Facelift History No applicable South African facelift history established Mid-cycle facelift in 2021 with IQ.Drive safety tech and updated infotainment
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2021
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment Passenger vehicle Not confirmed
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg - 1640 kg
Spec E5 EM-i Tiguan Allspace
Length 4740 mm 4703 mm
Width 1905 mm 1839 mm
Height 1685 mm 1674 mm
Wheelbase 2755 mm 2790 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 172 mm 198 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 57 l
Boot/Cargo Space 528 l 230 l
Kerb Weight 1770 kg 1640 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 2220 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 2000 kg
Seating Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 7 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Doors Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This E5 EM-i and Tiguan Allspace comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: E5 EM-i 39 vs Tiguan Allspace 75.

Efficiency index: E5 EM-i 79 vs Tiguan Allspace 49.

Safety-equipment index: E5 EM-i 91 vs Tiguan Allspace 98.

Practicality index: E5 EM-i 71 vs Tiguan Allspace 66.

Ownership-cover index: E5 EM-i not separately scored vs Tiguan Allspace not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiguan Allspace leads by 4 points

E5 EM-i and Tiguan Allspace are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 78% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

Tiguan Allspace

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 75
Efficiency 49
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Leads by 4 points
69
#2

E5 EM-i

55% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 79
Safety 91
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiguan Allspace +36 Efficiency E5 EM-i +30 Safety Tiguan Allspace +7 Practicality E5 EM-i +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiguan Allspace

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

E5 EM-i

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 69 pts for E5 EM-i

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiguan Allspace leads. However, E5 EM-i may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
H7
H7
E5 EM-i vs H7 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
E5 EM-i vs T-Roc →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
03T
03T
E5 EM-i vs 03T →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
E5 EM-i vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Sportage
Sportage
E5 EM-i vs Sportage →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
E5 EM-i vs Tiguan →
Tiguan Allspace
Tiguan AllspaceDiscontinued
VS
H7
H7
Tiguan Allspace vs H7 →
Tiguan Allspace
Tiguan AllspaceDiscontinued
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
Tiguan Allspace vs T-Roc →

E5 EM-i vs Tiguan Allspace questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.